Two problems for the proper functionalist analysis of epistemic warrant
Southwest Philosophy Review 15 (2):97-107 (1999)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
ISBN(s)
0897-2346
DOI
10.5840/swphilreview19991527
My notes
Similar books and articles
Was Hume a proper functionalist?Kevin Meeker - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (1):120–136.
When warrant transmits and when it doesn’t: towards a general framework.Luca Moretti & Tommaso Piazza - 2013 - Synthese 190 (13):2481-2503.
Plantinga's proper functioning analysis of epistemic warrant.James E. Taylor & Alvin Plantinga - 1991 - Philosophical Studies 64 (2):185 - 202.
Epistemic Warrant as Proper Function. [REVIEW]William Alston - 1995 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (2):397-402.
Proper Functionalism, Reliability, and Degrees of Epistemic Warrant.John C. Wingard - 1999 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 37 (4):653-664.
Plantinga's proper function account of warrant.Jonathan Kvanvig - 1996 - In J. J. Kvanvig (ed.), Warrant and Contemporary Epistemology. Rowman and Littlefield, Savage, Maryland.
Immediate warrant, epistemic responsibility, and Moorean dogmatism.Adam Leite - 2011 - In Andrew Reisner & Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen (eds.), Reasons for Belief. Cambridge University Press.
Warrant, Proper Function, Reliabilism and Defeasibility.Peter D. Klein - 1996 - In Kvanvig Jonathan (ed.), Warrant and Contemporary Epistemology. Rowman & Littlefield.
Analytics
Added to PP
2012-03-18
Downloads
42 (#280,303)
6 months
1 (#450,993)
2012-03-18
Downloads
42 (#280,303)
6 months
1 (#450,993)
Historical graph of downloads
