Noûs 39 (3):529–540 (2005)

Saul Kripke has convinced many of us that material things have their material origins essentially. Plutarch, through his Ship of Theseus story, has convinced many of us that material things can sometimes survive gradual replacements of their material parts, that they are materially nonrigid. By way of a series of counterexamples, I will argue that any attempt to specify what in particular is essential about material origins will founder on the phenomenon of material non-rigidity.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.0029-4624.2005.00512.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 56,016
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Naming and Necessity.Saul Kripke - 1980 - Harvard University Press.
Naming and Necessity.Saul Kripke - 1980 - In Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel (eds.), Philosophy. Routledge. pp. 431-433.
Theories of Masses and Problems of Constitution.Dean W. Zimmerman - 1995 - Philosophical Review 104 (1):53-110.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Production and Necessity.Louis deRosset - 2009 - Philosophical Review 118 (2):153-181.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Ontology of Material Objects.E. T. Olson - 2002 - Philosophical Books 43 (4):292-299.
Thomas Aquinas and Knowledge of Material Objects.Catherine Jack Deavel - 2009 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 83:269-278.
Material Beings.Peter Van Inwagen - 1990 - Ithaca: Cornell University Press.


Added to PP index

Total views
230 ( #37,744 of 2,403,646 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #155,999 of 2,403,646 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes