Michael Barnwell
Niagara University
Jacques Maritain asserted that Aquinas’s explanation of sin’s origin is “one of the most original of his philosophical discoveries.” In this explanation, Aquinas traces the origin of sin back to the will’s defect of failing to consider or use the rule of divine law. To succeed, Aquinas must show how this defect is both voluntarily caused by the agent and non-culpable despite its serving as the origin for sin. (If it were culpable, a non-explanatory regress would ensue.) Aquinas’s “original” solution hinges on his claim that the will is not always morally obligated to consider or use the rule. When Aquinas’s texts are closely examined, it becomes apparent that his explanation admits of two different interpretations. In this paper, both interpretations are scrutinized and found to be problematic. Despite its originality and courage in addressing what many consider inexplicable (namely, sin), Aquinas’s attempt seems not to be a successful discovery.
Keywords Aquinas  Sin  Maritain  Action Theory  Medieval  Voluntary  Culpability  Defect  Will
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1051-3558
DOI 10.5840/acpq201531751
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Problem of Propagation: Original Sin as Inherited Discourse.James Stillwaggon - 2014 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 33 (1):61-73.
Advance Directives and Personal Identity: What Is the Problem?E. Furberg - 2012 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (1):60-73.
Beyond Divorce: Current Status of the Discovery Debate.Thomas Nickles - 1985 - Philosophy of Science 52 (2):177-206.
The Aristotelian Epistemic Principle and the Problem of Divine Naming in Aquinas.Paul Symington - 2010 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 84:133-144.
Explaining Scientific Discovery.Aleksandar Jokic - 1991 - Dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara
Credit for Making a Discovery.Nicholas Rescher - 2005 - Episteme 1 (3):189-200.
Tomášovo pojetí čísla.P. Sousedík & D. Svoboda - 2010 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 17 (1):53-69.
Machine Discovery.Herbert Simon - 1995 - Foundations of Science 1 (2):171-200.


Added to PP index

Total views
83 ( #138,517 of 2,499,276 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,670 of 2,499,276 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes