All relevant sources agree that weeping is a human universal. There is disagreement, though, as to whether tears experienced during episodes of happiness or joy derive from the experience of joy itself, or whether such tears result merely from incidental physical constriction of the lacrimal gland or from a “sadness rebound” induced by anticipated loss of the source of joy . It is argued here that adult weeping does not exclusively express suffering but rather is an emotional and physical register of changes in self, both positive and negative. In outlining the argument concerning weeping the paper also presents an account of the registration and consolidation of changes in self-identity and self-feelings, and therefore provides an account of the internal process of transformation of self
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-5914.2005.00267.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 57,156
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life.Émile Durkheim - 1915 - New York: the Macmillan Company.
The Varieties of Religious Experience.William James - 1903 - Philosophical Review 12 (1):62-67.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
13 ( #717,151 of 2,411,736 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #539,061 of 2,411,736 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes