What Is at Stake in the Disagreement Between Interactivity and Enaction?

Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):249-251 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “Interactivity and Enaction in Human Cognition” by Matthew Isaac Harvey, Rasmus Gahrn-Andersen & Sune Vork Steffensen. Upshot: To sort out their differences with enactive theory, interactivity theorists would do better to focus on operational closure only insofar as it constitutes a condition of intrinsic normativity or self-regulated coupling.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,252

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Interactivity Should Aim to Extend, Not Reject, the Conceptual Foundations of Enaction.T. Froese - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):247-249.
Enaction, and Its Relation to Science in an Objective Key.F. Cummins - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):245-246.
The Role of Allostasis in Sense-Making: A Better Fit for Interactivity than Cybernetic-Enactivism?R. Lowe - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):251-254.
Interactivity and Enaction in Human Cognition.M. I. Harvey, R. Gahrn-Andersen & S. V. Steffensen - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):234-245.
What is interactivity?Aaron Smuts - 2009 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 43 (4):pp. 53-73.
Enaction: An Incomplete Paradigm for Consciousness Science. Review of “Enaction: Toward a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science” edited by John Stewart, Olivier Gapenne and Ezequiel A. Di Paolo.D. A. Reid - 2011 - Constructivist Foundations 7 (1):81-83.
Phenomenological Teleology and Human Interactivity.R. Gahrn-Andersen & M. I. Harvey - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):224-226.
Symmetry and interactivity in programming.P. -L. Curien - 2003 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 9 (2):169-180.
The Myth of Media Interactivity.Kiyoshi Abe - 2009 - Theory, Culture and Society 26 (2-3):73-88.
Video Games and the Philosophy of Art.Aaron Smuts - 2005 - American Society for Aesthetics Newsletter.
Face to Face (II): Semiotics of Interactivity. [REVIEW]Jan M. Broekman - 2010 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 23 (1):41-48.
Toward combining autonomy and interactivity for social robots.Yasser Mohammad & Toyoaki Nishida - 2009 - AI and Society 24 (1):35-49.
Enaction-based artificial intelligence: Toward co-evolution with humans in the loop. [REVIEW]Pierre De Loor, Kristen Manac’H. & Jacques Tisseau - 2009 - Minds and Machines 19 (3):319-343.
Interactivity and multimedia interfaces.David Kirsh - 1997 - Instructional Science 25:79-96.
Empathy, enaction, and shared musical experience.Joel Krueger - 2013 - In Tom Cochrane, Bernardino Fantini & Klaus Scherer (eds.), The Emotional Power of Music: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Musical Expression, Arousal and Social Control. Oxford University Press. pp. 177-196.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-03-17

Downloads
15 (#899,486)

6 months
1 (#1,478,435)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references