Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):459-459 (2004)

Abstract
An evolutionary model of crying requires consideration of nonhuman primate data. Chimpanzees do not have colic. Although they have a peak of fussiness at 6 weeks with a decline by 12 weeks whether raised by biological mothers or in a human nursery, their crying is always consolable. Colic may be a by-product of delayed rates of brain development; that is, neoteny.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x04220106
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,634
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Evolutionary Games Without Rationality?Martin Bunzl - 2002 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (3):365-378.
Infant Crying and Colic: What Lies Beneath.John D. Newman - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):470-471.
Colic and the Early Crying Curve: A Developmental Account.Debra M. Zeifman - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):476-477.
The Signal Functions of Early Infant Crying.Joseph Soltis - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):443-458.
From an Undifferentiated Cry Towards a Modulated Signal.Johannes Lehtonen - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):467-467.
On the Utility of an Evolutionary Approach to Infant Crying.Rebecca M. Wood - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):475-476.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
31 ( #319,201 of 2,348,974 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #330,968 of 2,348,974 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes