Why metrical properties are not powers
Synthese 190 (12):2001-2013 (2013)
Abstract
What has the dispositional analysis of properties and laws (e.g. Molnar, Powers, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003; Mumford, Laws in nature, Routledge London, 2004; Bird, Nature’s metaphysics, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2007) to offer to the scientific understanding of physical properties?—The article provides an answer to this question for the case of spacetime points and their metrical properties in General Relativity. The analysis shows that metrical properties are not ‘powers’, i.e. they cannot be understood as producing the effects of spacetime on matter with metaphysical necessity. Instead they possess categorical characteristics which, in connection with specific laws, explain those effects. Thus, the properties of spacetime do not favor the metaphysics of powers with respect to properties and lawsDOI
10.1007/s11229-011-9951-3
My notes
Similar books and articles
Causal powers and categorical properties.Brian Ellis - 2009 - In Anna Marmodoro (ed.), The Metaphysics of Powers: Their Grounding and Their Manifestations. Routledge.
Structural properties.Alexander Bird - 2003 - In Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra & Hallvard Lillehammer (eds.), Real Metaphysics. Routledge. pp. 155-68.
Relational properties, causal powers and psychological laws.Sean Crawford - 2003 - Acta Analytica 18 (30-31):193-216.
Modern essentialism and the problem of individuation of spacetime points.Andreas Bartels - 1996 - Erkenntnis 45 (1):25--43.
Some good and some not so good arguments for necessary laws William Russell Payne ph.D.W. Russ Payne - manuscript
What Do Powers Do When They Are Not Manifested?Stathis Psillos - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (1):137-156.
On two arguments for subset inheritance.Kevin Morris - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 163 (1):197-211.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-06-30
Downloads
70 (#173,699)
6 months
1 (#450,993)
2013-06-30
Downloads
70 (#173,699)
6 months
1 (#450,993)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Dependence relations in general relativity.Antonio Vassallo - 2020 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 10 (1):1-28.
Palamism and Dispositionalism: Comment on raslau's Integration of Orthodox Theology with Contemporary Metaphysics of Science.Travis Dumsday - 2022 - Zygon 57 (4):889-911.
Dispositions, Causes, Persistence As Is, and General Relativity.Joel Katzav - 2013 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 27 (1):41-57.
References found in this work
Powers:A Study in Metaphysics: A Study in Metaphysics.George Molnar (ed.) - 2003 - Oxford University Press.