Philo 14 (2):137-160 (2011)
Some philosophers have argued that the concepts of evil and wickedness cannot be well grasped by those inclined to a naturalist bent, perhaps because evil is so intimately tied to religious discourse or because it is ultimately not possible to understand evil, period. By contrast, I argue that evil—or, at least, what it is to be an evil person—can be understood by naturalist philosophers, and I articulate an independently plausible account of evil character
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Punishment and Desert.James Rachels - 1997 - In Hugh LaFollette - (ed.), Ethics in Practice. Blackwell. pp. 466--74.
Can the Bad Outcomes of Wicked Actions Be Ascribed to Wickedness Itself?Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz - unknown
Wickedness Inscribed in Freedom : Jean-Luc Nancy on Evil.Sami Santanen - 2010 - In Ari Hirvonen & Janne Porttikivi (eds.), Law and Evil: Philosophy, Politics, Psychoanalysis. Routledge.
Added to index2009-06-09
Total downloads819 ( #954 of 2,146,457 )
Recent downloads (6 months)60 ( #3,223 of 2,146,457 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.