Wickedness Redux

Philo 14 (2):137-160 (2011)
Some philosophers have argued that the concepts of evil and wickedness cannot be well grasped by those inclined to a naturalist bent, perhaps because evil is so intimately tied to religious discourse or because it is ultimately not possible to understand evil, period. By contrast, I argue that evil—or, at least, what it is to be an evil person—can be understood by naturalist philosophers, and I articulate an independently plausible account of evil character
Keywords evil  wickedness
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/Philo201114211
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Punishment and Desert.James Rachels - 1997 - In Hugh LaFollette - (ed.), Ethics in Practice. Blackwell. pp. 466--74.
Wickedness.S. I. Benn - 1985 - Ethics 95 (4):795-810.
Virtue, Knowledge, and Wickedness.Ronald D. Milo - 1998 - Social Philosophy and Policy 15 (1):196.
Wickedness.Ronald D. Milo - 1983 - American Philosophical Quarterly 20 (1):69 - 79.
Wickedness: A Philosophical Essay.Mary Midgley - 1984 - Routledge & Kegan Paul.
The Concept of Evil.Marcus G. Singer - 2004 - Philosophy 79 (2):185-214.
Wickedness.Mary Midgley - 1984 - Routledge.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

819 ( #954 of 2,146,457 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

60 ( #3,223 of 2,146,457 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums