Why the Infinite Decision Puzzle is Puzzling

Theory and Decision 52 (2):139-147 (2002)
Abstract
Pulier (2000, Theory and Decision 49: 291) and Machina (2000, Theory and Decision 49: 293) seek to dissolve the Barrett–Arntzenius infinite decision puzzle (1999, Theory and Decision 46: 101). The proposed dissolutions, however, are based on misunderstandings concerning how the puzzle works and the nature of supertasks more generally. We will describe the puzzle in a simplified form, address the recent misunderstandings, and describe possible morals for decision theory
Keywords Dutch book  Supertask  Puzzle
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1015564123344
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,173
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Infinite Exchange Problems.Michael Scott & Alexander Scott - 2004 - Theory and Decision 57 (4):397-406.
Do Pragmatic Arguments Show Too Much?Martin Peterson - 2016 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 6 (2):165-172.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-09-02

Total downloads

138 ( #33,125 of 2,152,487 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

16 ( #27,401 of 2,152,487 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums