Philosophical Studies 171 (2):177-205 (2014)

Authors
David James Barnett
University of Toronto, St. George Campus
Abstract
If the reliability of a source of testimony is open to question, it seems epistemically illegitimate to verify the source’s reliability by appealing to that source’s own testimony. Is this because it is illegitimate to trust a questionable source’s testimony on any matter whatsoever? Or is there a distinctive problem with appealing to the source’s testimony on the matter of that source’s own reliability? After distinguishing between two kinds of epistemically illegitimate circularity—bootstrapping and self-verification—I argue for a qualified version of the claim that there is nothing especially illegitimate about using a questionable source to evaluate its own reliability. Instead, it is illegitimate to appeal to a questionable source’s testimony on any matter whatsoever, with the matter of the source’s own reliability serving only as a special case.
Keywords Epistemic circularity  Bootstrapping  Skepticism  Closure  Uniqueness thesis
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2014
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-013-0261-0
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Philosophical Explanations.Robert Nozick - 1981 - Harvard University Press.
The Structure of Empirical Knowledge.Laurence BonJour - 1985 - Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.
The Skeptic and the Dogmatist.James Pryor - 2000 - Noûs 34 (4):517–549.
Epistemic Operators.Fred I. Dretske - 1970 - Journal of Philosophy 67 (24):1007-1023.

View all 64 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Normative Externalism.Brian Weatherson - 2019 - Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
The Evil Demon Inside.Nicholas Silins - 2020 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 100 (2):325-343.
Is Memory Merely Testimony From One's Former Self?David James Barnett - 2015 - Philosophical Review 124 (3):353-392.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Is Epistemic Circularity Bad?Matthias Steup - 2013 - Res Philosophica 90 (2):215-235.
In Defense of Epistemic Circularity.David Alexander - 2011 - Acta Analytica 26 (3):223-241.
Harmless Epistemic Circularity?Juho Ritola - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 53:227-233.
Reflective Knowledge and Epistemic Circularity.C. S. I. Jenkins - 2011 - Philosophical Papers 40 (3):305-325.
Epistemic Circularity and Common Sense: A Reply to Reed.Michael Bergmann - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (1):198-207.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-13

Total views
681 ( #9,818 of 2,455,641 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
75 ( #9,200 of 2,455,641 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes