Essence, Effluence, and Emanation: A Neo-Suarezian Analysis

Studia Neoaristotelica 18 (2):139-186 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The subject of this essay is propria and their relation to essence. Propria, roughly characterized, are those real properties of a thing which are natural but nonessential to it, and which are said to “flow from” the thing’s essence, where this “flows from” relation is understood to designate a kind of explanatory relation. For example, it is said that Socrates’s risibility flows from his essential humanity; and it is said that salt’s solubility in water flows from the essential natures of both salt and water. The question I raise and attempt to answer in this essay is: In what sense do propria “flow from” essences? What kind of explanatory relation is this exactly? Some suggest that it is a relation of logical consequence ; others, of grounding ; and still others, of formal causation. In this essay, I reintroduce and defend a view suggested by the late scholastic Spanish philosopher and theologian Francisco Suárez, who in 1597 wrote that effluence is best understood as a very special kind of efficient causation, which we can call the relation of emanation. The thesis of this essay, then, is that propria emanate from essences. Along the way, this paper offers a new taxonomy of types of propria; it explains the significance of propria for the metaphysics and epistemology of essences; it discusses at length varieties of efficient causation ; and then it offers an extensive abductive argument in favor of Suárez’s account, whereby the former accounts of effluence are critiqued, each in turn, and Suárez’s view is motivated and ultimately shown to be superior to its competitors.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Essence, Propria and Essentialist Explanation.Zeyu Chi - 2020 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 23 (2):338-361.
Formal Causes for Powers Theorists.Giacomo Giannini & Stephen Mumford - 2021 - In Ludger Jansen & Petter Sandstad, Neo-Aristotelian Perspectives on Formal Causation. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. pp. 87-106.
Formal Causes for Powers Theorists.Giacomo Giannini & Stephen Mumford - 2021 - In Ludger Jansen & Petter Sandstad, Neo-Aristotelian Perspectives on Formal Causation. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. pp. 87-106.
Spinoza’s Essentialist Model of Causation.Valtteri Viljanen - 2008 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 51 (4):412-437.
Essence, Necessity, and Explanation.Kathrin Koslicki - 2011 - In Tuomas E. Tahko, Contemporary Aristotelian Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 187--206.
Francisco Suárez on the Ontological Status of Divine Action.R. J. Matava - 2016 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly.
Spinoza, Emanation, and Formal Causation.Stephen Zylstra - 2023 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 61 (4):603-625.
Spinoza on the Essences of Modes.Thomas M. Ward - 2011 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (1):19-46.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-01-15

Downloads
786 (#34,897)

6 months
184 (#23,170)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrew Dennis Bassford
Creighton University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references