Griffin and Pike on Divine Power: Some Clarifications

Philosophy Research Archives 10:347-352 (1984)
Authors
Abstract
David Griffin and Nelson Pike recently had a spirited discussion on divine power. The essence of the discussion centered around what was labelled Premise X: “It is possible for one actual being's condition to be completely determined by a being or beings other than itself.” Pike maintains that ‘traditional’ theists have affirmed Premise X but denies that this entails that God has all the power there is and thus denies that Premise X can be considered incoherent for this reason. Griffin maintains that traditional theists have as a matter of fact affirmed that God has all the power there is and then argues that, given standard Process metaphysical assumptions, to say that God has all the power there is is incoherent. Griffin succeeds in demonstrating that, given Process assumptions, God cannot determine all of the activities of any human--i.e., all of an individual’s desires, choices and actions. But Pike is primarily interested in whether God could determine all of the bodily behaviors of any given human. And to this question, Griffin gives no response.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI pra1984108
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,471
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Griffin and Pike on Divine Power.David Basinger - 1984 - Philosophy Research Archives 10:347-352.
Agency and Human Rights.S. Matthew Liao - 2010 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (1):15-25.
Griffin on Human Rights.Roger Crisp (ed.) - 2014 - Oxford University Press.
Ghazali's Chapter on Divine Power in the Iqti Ād.Michael E. Marmura - 1994 - Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 4 (2):279.
Griffin on Human Rights.Brad Hooker - 2010 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 30 (1):193-205.
Could Process Theodicy Uphold the Generic Idea of God? Pak - 2014 - American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 35 (3):211-228.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-15

Total downloads
1 ( #1,063,730 of 2,285,798 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #390,440 of 2,285,798 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes

Sign in to use this feature