Foucault Studies 14:154-178 (2012)

In this paper I focus on the emergence of the concept of the “historical a priori” at the origin of Foucault’s archeology. I emphasize the methodological function of this concept within Foucault’s archaeology, and I maintain that despite the different thesis it entails as compared to its philosophical sources, it pertains to one of the main issues of phenomenology, that is, the problematization of the relation between reality as it appears in its historicity, and transcendentality. I start from the interest of the young Foucault in existential psychiatry, and I focus on the French philosophical context in which Foucault’s Introduction to Ludwig Binswanger’s “Dream and Existence” (1954) was conceived. My aim is to show that the first “phenomenological” phase of Foucault’s work is coherent, from a methodological point of view, with the development of archaeology intended as “historical epistemology.” I conclude by arguing that Foucault’s archaeology is methodologically linked to Canguilhem’s epistemology, in that the latter presents itself as an important attempt at linking together historicity and transcendentality
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.22439/fs.v0i14.3904
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,231
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

What Is Experience? Foucauldian Perspectives.Sanna Tirkkonen - 2019 - Open Philosophy 2 (1):447-461.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
160 ( #74,195 of 2,518,495 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #271,901 of 2,518,495 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes