Russell on Spinoza’s Substance Monism

Metaphysica 13 (1):27-41 (2012)

Authors
Abstract
Russell’s critique of substance monism is an ideal starting point from which to understand some main concepts in Spinoza’s difficult metaphysics. This paper provides an in-depth examination of Spinoza’s proof that only one substance exists. On this basis, it rejects Russell’s interpretation of Spinoza’s theory of reality as founded upon the logical doctrine that all propositions consist of a predicate and a subject. An alternative interpretation is offered: Spinoza’s substance is not a bearer of properties, as Russell implied, but an eternally active, self-actualizing creative power. Eventually, Spinoza the Monist and Russell the Pluralist are at one in holding that process and activity rather than enduring things are the most fundamental realities
Keywords Russell  Spinoza  Substance  Monism  Attribute  Power
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s12133-011-0090-6
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,223
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Spinoza's 'Ethics': An Introduction.Steven Nadler - 2006 - Cambridge University Press.
A Study of Spinoza's Ethics.Jonathan Bennett - 1984 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Learning From Leibniz: Whitehead on Mind, Matter and Monads.Pierfrancesco Basile - 2015 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (6):1128-1149.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Spinoza on Composition and Priority.Ghislain Guigon - 2011 - In Philip Goff (ed.), Spinoza on Monism. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Spinoza and the Stoics on Substance Monism.Jon Miller - 2009 - In Olli Koistinen (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza's Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
Spinoza and Process Ontology.Francesca di Poppa - 2010 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 48 (3):272-294.
Spinoza, Gueroult, and Substance.A. D. Smith - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (3):655-688.
Nature, Number and Individuals: Motive and Method in Spinoza's Philosophy.Marx W. Wartofsky - 1977 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 20 (1-4):457 – 479.
Henry More and Nicolas Malebranche's Critiques of Spinoza.Jasper Reid - 2015 - European Journal of Philosophy 23 (3):764-792.
Ch'an Buddhism, Western Thought, and the Concept of Substance.Paul Wienpahl - 1971 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 14 (1-4):84 – 101.
Acosmism or Weak Individuals?: Hegel, Spinoza, and the Reality of the Finite.Yitzhak Y. Melamed - 2010 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (1):pp. 77-92.
A Note on Descartes and Spinoza.Jonathan Bennett - 1965 - Philosophical Review 74 (3):379-380.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-12-08

Total views
171 ( #46,968 of 2,285,684 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #52,592 of 2,285,684 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature