Critical Inquiry: Considering the Context [Book Review]
Argumentation 25 (2):243-253 (2011)
In this paper we discuss the relevance of considering context for critical thinking. We argue that critical thinking is best viewed in terms of ‘critical inquiry’ in which argumentation is seen as a way of arriving at reasoned judgments on complex issues. This is a dialectical process involving the comparative weighing of a variety of contending positions and arguments. Using the model which we have developed for teaching critical thinking as critical inquiry, we demonstrate the role played by the following aspects of context: (1) knowledge of the dialectical context (the debate around an issue, both current and historical); (2) an understanding of the current state of practice and belief surrounding an issue; (3) an understanding of the intellectual, political, historical and social contexts in which an issue is embedded; (4) knowledge of the relevant disciplinary context; (5) information about the sources of an argument; (6) awareness of one’s own beliefs and biases
|Keywords||Critical thinking Inquiry Context Reasoned judgments Dialectical|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Critical Thinking From the Margins.Mark Weinstein - 2012 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 27 (2):5-14.
Defining Critical Thinking.Maria Sanders & Jason Moulenbelt - 2011 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 26 (1):38-46.
Reflections on the Nature of Critical Thinking, Its History, Politics, and Barriers and on Its Status Across the College/UniversityCurriculum Part II.Richard Paul - 2012 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 27 (1):5-30.
Review of Reason in the Balance: An Inquiry Approach to Critical Thinking by Sharon Bailin and Mark Battersby. [REVIEW]Linda Carroza - 2012 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 27 (1):47-49.
Integrating Critical Thinking Into Daily Life.Steve Cady - 2004 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 23 (3):33-36.
Critical Thinking as a Constructive Rather Than Destructive Force in Interpersonal Relationships.Mary Vasudeva & Stuart Keeley - 2004 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 23 (3):17-22.
The Social Fallout of Critical Thinking.Andrea Giampetro-Meyer - 2004 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 23 (3):27-31.
Critical Thinking: A Question of Aptitude and Attitude?Carlos Saiz & Ana M. Nieto - 2010 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 25 (2):19-26.
The Dialogue of Creative and Critical Thinking.Suzanne Miller - 2005 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 24 (4):37-43.
Sharon Bailin and Mark Battersby: Reason in Balance: An Inquiry Approach to Critical Thinking. [REVIEW]Claude Gratton - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (1):93-96.
From Argument and Philosophy to Critical Thinking Across the Curriculum.Gerald Nosich - 2010 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 25 (3):4-13.
Faculty as Critical Thinkers.Claire Phillips & Susan Green - 2011 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 26 (2):44-50.
Added to index2011-04-14
Total downloads44 ( #118,688 of 2,171,820 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #173,716 of 2,171,820 )
How can I increase my downloads?