Critical Inquiry: Considering the Context [Book Review]

Argumentation 25 (2):243-253 (2011)

Mark Battersby
Capilano University
In this paper we discuss the relevance of considering context for critical thinking. We argue that critical thinking is best viewed in terms of ‘critical inquiry’ in which argumentation is seen as a way of arriving at reasoned judgments on complex issues. This is a dialectical process involving the comparative weighing of a variety of contending positions and arguments. Using the model which we have developed for teaching critical thinking as critical inquiry, we demonstrate the role played by the following aspects of context: (1) knowledge of the dialectical context (the debate around an issue, both current and historical); (2) an understanding of the current state of practice and belief surrounding an issue; (3) an understanding of the intellectual, political, historical and social contexts in which an issue is embedded; (4) knowledge of the relevant disciplinary context; (5) information about the sources of an argument; (6) awareness of one’s own beliefs and biases
Keywords Critical thinking  Inquiry  Context  Reasoned judgments  Dialectical
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10503-011-9205-z
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 40,785
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Inquiry: A New Paradigm for Critical Thinking.Mark Battersby (ed.) - 2018 - Windsor, Canada: Windsor Studies in Argumentation.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
54 ( #144,275 of 2,243,844 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #319,328 of 2,243,844 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature