Critical thinking and cognitive biases

Abstract

We argue that psychological research can enhance the identification of reasoning errors and the development of an appropriate pedagogy to instruct people in how to avoid these errors. In this paper we identify some of the findings of psychologists that help explain some common fallacies, give examples of fallacies identified in the research that have not been typically identified in philosophy, and explore ways in which this research can enhance critical thinking instruction.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Aid and bias.Keith Horton - 2004 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 47 (6):545 – 561.
The Ethics of Argumentation.Vasco Correia - 2012 - Informal Logic 32 (2):222-241.
Thinking about Critical Thinking.Jeffrey Maynes - 2013 - Teaching Philosophy 36 (4):337-351.
Ad Hominem Fallacies, Bias, and Testimony.Audrey Yap - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (2):97-109.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-02

Downloads
30 (#521,181)

6 months
5 (#638,139)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?