Response to Belot’s “Whose Devil? Which Details?‘

Philosophy of Science 72 (1):154-163 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I respond to Belot's argument and defend the view that sometimes `fundamental theories' are explanatorily inadequate and need to be supplemented with certain aspects of less fundamental `theories emeritus'.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Black hole remnants and classical vs. quantum gravity.Peter Bokulich - 2001 - Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2001 (3):S407-.
Whose Devil? Which Details?Gordon Belot - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (1):128-153.
Frisch, Muller, and Belot on an inconsistency in classical electrodynamics.Peter Vickers - 2008 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (4):767-792.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
260 (#74,983)

6 months
7 (#411,886)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert W. Batterman
University of Pittsburgh

Citations of this work

On the explanatory role of mathematics in empirical science.Robert W. Batterman - 2010 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (1):1-25.
Can classical structures explain quantum phenomena?Alisa Bokulich - 2008 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (2):217-235.
Model Explanation Versus Model-Induced Explanation.Insa Lawler & Emily Sullivan - 2021 - Foundations of Science 26 (4):1049-1074.

View all 21 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Aspects of Scientific Explanation.Michael D. Resnik - 1966 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 27 (1):139-140.
Critical phenomena and breaking drops: Infinite idealizations in physics.Robert Batterman - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 36 (2):225-244.
On the reality of gauge potentials.Richard Healey - 2001 - Philosophy of Science 68 (4):432-455.
Falling cats, parallel parking, and polarized light.Robert W. Batterman - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34 (4):527-557.

View all 8 references / Add more references