Scents and Sensibilia

American Philosophical Quarterly 47 (2):103-118 (2010)
Authors
Clare Batty
University of Kentucky
Abstract
This paper considers what olfactory experience can tell us about the controversy over qualia and, in particular, the debate that focuses on the alleged transparency of experience. The appeal to transparency is supposed to show that there are no qualia—intrinsic, non-intentional and directly accessible properties of experience that determine phenomenal character. It is most commonly used to motivate intentionalism—namely, the view that the phenomenal character of an experience is exhausted by its representational content. Although some philosophers claim that transparency holds for all of the sense modalities, any detailed discussion of it focuses on vision. But transparency seems unintuitive for olfactory experience. This paper argues that olfactory experience is indeed transparent and that explanations of what transparency is have been obscured by a reliance on the visual model. In this way, the paper clarifies and advances the debate about transparency.
Keywords olfaction  perception  qualia  olfactory experience
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,562
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Perceptual Content and the Content of Mental Imagery.Bence Nanay - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (7):1723-1736.
Sniffing and Smelling.Louise Richardson - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 162 (2):401-419.
Lessons From Beyond Vision (Sounds and Audition).Casey O'Callaghan - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 153 (1):143-160.
What's That Smell?Clare Batty - 2009 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 47 (4):321-348.
A Representational Account of Olfactory Experience.Clare Batty - 2010 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 40 (4):511-538.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Transparency and the Unity of Experience.John O'Dea - 2008 - In E. Wright (ed.), The Case for Qualia. MIT Press. pp. 299.
What the Nose Doesn't Know: Non-Veridicality and Olfactory Experience.Clare Batty - 2010 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 17 (3-4):10-17.
Heirs of Nothing: The Implications of Transparency.Matthew Kennedy - 2009 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79 (3):574-604.
What's so Transparent About Transparency?Amy Kind - 2003 - Philosophical Studies 115 (3):225-244.
The Contents of Olfactory Experience.Christopher Mole - 2010 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 17 (11-12):173-79.
Smelling Lessons.Clare Batty - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 153 (1):161-174.
A Representational Account of Olfactory Experience.Clare Batty - 2010 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 40 (4):511-538.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-11

Total downloads
149 ( #38,720 of 2,268,362 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #211,892 of 2,268,362 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature