Sosa's Reflective Knowledge: How damaging is epistemic circularity?

Synthese 188 (2):289-308 (2012)

Authors
Heather Battaly
University of Connecticut
Abstract
The problem of epistemic circularity maintains that we cannot know that our central belief-forming practices (faculties) are reliable without vicious circularity. Ernest Sosa's Reflective Knowledge (2009) offers a solution to this problem. Sosa argues that epistemic circularity is virtuous rather than vicious: it is not damaging. Contra Sosa, I contend that epistemic circularity is damaging. Section 1 provides an overview of Sosa's solution. Section 2 focuses on Sosa's reply to the Crystal ballgazer Objection. Section 2 also contends that epistemic circularity does not prevent us from tóng justified in (e. g.) perceptual beliefs, or from being justified in believing that (e. g.) sense perception is reliable. But, Sect. 3 argues that it does prevent us from being able to satisfactorily show that our central belief-forming practices (faculties) are reliable. That is, epistemic circularity prevents us from distinguishing between reliable and unreliable practices, from guiding ourselves to use reliable practices and avoid unreliable ones, and from defending reliable practices against skepticism. Hence, epistemic circularity is still damaging. The concluding section suggests that this has repercussions for Sosa's analysis of the value of reflective knowledge
Keywords William Alston  Epistemic circularity  Epistemic justification  Externalism  Internalism  Knowledge  Problem of the criterion  Reflective knowledge  Ernest Sosa  Skepticism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-011-9928-2
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,928
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What is Justified Belief.Alvin I. Goldman - 1979 - In George Pappas (ed.), Justification and Knowledge. Boston: D. Reidel. pp. 1-25.
Epistemic Justification.William Alston - 1989 - Cornell University Press.
Reflective Knowledge.Ernest Sosa - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
Knowledge in Perspective.Ernest Sosa - 1991 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Reflective Knowledge and Epistemic Circularity.C. S. I. Jenkins - 2011 - Philosophical Papers 40 (3):305-325.
Sosa, Certainty and the Problem of the Criterion.Michael DePaul - 2011 - Philosophical Papers 40 (3):287-304.
Reflections on Reflective Knowledge.Ram Neta - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 153 (1):3 - 17.
Epistemic Circularity and the Problem of Cheap Credit.Anne Meylan - 2011 - Philosophical Papers 40 (3):327-340.
Sosa in Perspective.Hilary Kornblith - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 144 (1):127--136.
Adhoccery in Epistemology.Berit Brogaard - 2003 - Philosophical Papers 32 (1):65-82.
In Defense of Epistemic Circularity.David J. Alexander - 2011 - Acta Analytica 26 (3):223-241.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-10-03

Total views
68 ( #104,743 of 2,319,325 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #84,016 of 2,319,325 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature