Authors
Abstract
This essay seeks to explicate several strands of Environmental Philosophy by applying them to agenuine example of environmental conflict. The recent invasion of the Tasmanian wilderness bythe European Fox, threatens several critically endangered mammals, not to mention the ecosystem as a whole. The DPIW has begun placing poisoned bait in the Tasmanian wilderness in an attempt to rid it of the fox. Rather than prescribing a solution to this complex problem, this essay tests the capacity of pre-existing ethics to protect the endangered mammals of Tasmania. In elucidating the Utilitarian and Rights Based approaches to ethics, it becomes clear that they harbour highly problematic elements. Following this, the essay explores the benefits of holistic ethics, and ethics based on difference. Ultimately, this essay seeks to discover what an ethical response to the Tasmanian situation would look like
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Upload history
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Famine, Affluence, and Morality.Peter Singer - 1972 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (3):229-243.
The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan & Mary Midgley - 1986 - The Personalist Forum 2 (1):67-71.
Famine, Affluence, and Morality.Peter Singer - 1972 - Oxford University Press USA.
The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 1985 - Human Studies 8 (4):389-392.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Freedom and Capacity.Jan Srzednicki - 1984 - Philosophy 59 (229):343 - 348.
Poisoning the Well and Epistemic Privilege.Ben Kotzee - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (3):265-281.
Poisoning the Well.Douglas Walton - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (3):273-307.
Lead Poisoning and the Race.Thomas Oliver - 1911 - The Eugenics Review 3 (2):83.
The Boy, the Grapes, and the Foxes.A. Y. Campbell - 1931 - Classical Quarterly 25 (2):90-102.
On Hedgehogs and Foxes.Jonathan Gorman - 1999 - Philosophical Inquiry 21 (1):61-86.
When and Why Do Hedgehogs and Foxes Differ?Frank C. Keil - 2010 - Critical Review 22 (4):415-426.
Moral Skepticism for Foxes.Daniel Star - 2010 - Boston University Law Review 90:497-508.
Foxes, Hounds, and Horses: Who or Which?Anthea Fraser Gupta - 2006 - Society and Animals 14 (1):107-128.
Ethological Foxes and Cognitive Hedgehogs.Jeffrey Cynx & Stephen J. Clark - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (4):756-757.
Foxes in the Hen House.David J. Wolfson & Mariann Sullivan - 2004 - In Cass R. Sunstein & Martha Craven Nussbaum (eds.), Animal Rights: Current Debates and New Directions. Oxford University Press. pp. 205--228.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-02-19

Total views
109 ( #83,324 of 2,330,639 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #69,488 of 2,330,639 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes