Why Zeno’s Paradoxes of Motion are Actually About Immobility

Foundations of Science 23 (4):649-679 (2018)
Authors
Maël Bathfield
Université Claude Bernard Lyon I (PhD)
Abstract
Zeno’s paradoxes of motion, allegedly denying motion, have been conceived to reinforce the Parmenidean vision of an immutable world. The aim of this article is to demonstrate that these famous logical paradoxes should be seen instead as paradoxes of immobility. From this new point of view, motion is therefore no longer logically problematic, while immobility is. This is convenient since it is easy to conceive that immobility can actually conceal motion, and thus the proposition “immobility is mere illusion of the senses” is much more credible than the reverse thesis supported by Parmenides. Moreover, this proposition is also supported by modern depiction of material bodies: the existence of a ceaseless random motion of atoms—the ‘thermal agitation’—in the scope of contemporary atomic theory, can offer a rational explanation of this ‘illusion of immobility’. Our new approach to Zeno’s paradoxes therefore leads to presenting the novel concept of ‘impermobility’, which we think is a more adequate description of physical reality.
Keywords Zeno’s paradoxes  illusion  motion  immobility  thermal agitation
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10699-017-9544-9
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

In Defense of the Existence of States of Motion.Michael Tooley - 1988 - Philosophical Topics 16 (1):225-254.
A Beautiful Supertask.Jon Perez Laraudogoitia - 1996 - Mind 105 (417):81-83.
Achilles, the Tortoise, and Colliding Balls.Jeanne Peijnenburg & David Atkinson - 2008 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 25 (3):187 - 201.
The Collapse of Supertasks.Gustavo E. Romero - 2014 - Foundations of Science 19 (2):209-216.

View all 46 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Zeno's Paradoxes on Motion.John O. Nelson - 1963 - Review of Metaphysics 16 (3):486 - 490.
Zeno's Paradoxes.Nicholas Huggett - forthcoming - The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (Ed.).
Modern Science and Zeno's Paradoxes of Motion.Adolf Grünbaum - 1970 - In Wesley C. Salmon (ed.), Zeno’s Paradoxes. Bobbs-Merrill. pp. 200--250.
Zeno's Paradoxes and Continuity.Ian Mueller - 1969 - Mind 78 (309):129-131.
Motion and the Dialectical View of the World.Laszlô Szôkely - 1990 - Studies in East European Thought 39 (3-4):241-255.
The Persuasiveness of Zeno's Paradoxes.John R. Mckie - 1987 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (4):631-639.
What the Liar Taught Achilles.Gary Mar & Paul St Denis - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (1):29-46.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-11-09

Total downloads
102 ( #61,579 of 2,285,003 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
28 ( #14,416 of 2,285,003 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature