An Abductive Theory of Constitution

Philosophy of Science 84 (2):214-233 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The first part of this paper finds Craver’s (2007) mutual manipulability theory (MM) of constitution inadequate, as it definitionally ties constitution to the feasibility of idealized experiments, which, however, are unrealizable in principle. As an alternative, the second part develops an abductive theory of constitution (NDC), which exploits the fact that phenomena and their constituents are unbreakably coupled via common causes. The best explanation for this common-cause coupling is the existence of an additional dependence relation, viz. constitution. Apart from adequately capturing the essential characteristics of constitution missed by MM, NDC has important ramifications for constitutional discovery—most notably, that there is no experimentum crucis for constitution, not even under ideal discovery circumstances.

Similar books and articles

Constitutive Relevance, Mutual Manipulability, and Fat-Handedness.Michael Baumgartner & Alexander Gebharter - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (3):731-756.
Mechanistic Constitution in Neurobiological Explanations.Jens Harbecke - 2010 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (3):267-285.
Against Originalism: Getting over the U. S. constitution.Austin W. Bramwell - 2004 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 16 (4):431-453.
Schutz’s Theory of Constitution.Thomas A. Michaud - 1987 - Philosophy Research Archives 13:63-71.
On constitution and all-fusions.Hud Hudson - 2000 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 81 (3):237–245.
The Politics of Self Constitution.Patrick Fitzsimons - 1997 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 29 (1):75-88.


Added to PP

915 (#15,852)

6 months
160 (#20,739)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Lorenzo Casini
IMT School for Advanced Studies, Lucca
Michael Baumgartner
Bergen University