Adequate formalization

Synthese 164 (1):93-115 (2008)
Abstract
 This article identifies problems with regard to providing criteria that regulate the matching of logical formulae and natural language. We then take on to solve these problems by defining a necessary and sufficient criterion of adequate formalization. On the basis of this criterion we argue that logic should not be seen as an ars iudicandi capable of evaluating the validity or invalidity of informal arguments, but as an ars explicandi that renders transparent the formal structure of informal reasoning
Keywords Logic  Philosophy of logic  Theory of formalization  Applied logic
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-007-9218-1
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,205
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Fact, Fiction, and Forecast.Nelson Goodman - 1955 - Harvard University Press.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Vagueness and Quantification.Andrea Iacona - 2015 - Journal of Philosophical Logic (5):1-24.
Shallow Analysis and the Slingshot Argument.Michael Baumgartner - 2010 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (5):531-556.
Causal Slingshots.Michael Baumgartner - 2010 - Erkenntnis 72 (1):111-133.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

146 ( #31,259 of 2,154,174 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

14 ( #36,369 of 2,154,174 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums