Defending the One Percent? Poor Arguments for the Rich?

Authors
Peter Baumann
Swarthmore College
Abstract
This is a reply to and critique of Gregory Mankiw's recent paper "Defending the One Percent".
Keywords Inequality  Political Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Is Inequality Bad for Our Health?Jeffrey D. Milyo & Jennifer M. Mellor - 1999 - Critical Review 13 (3-4):359-372.
Inequality.Larry S. Temkin - 1993 - Oxford University Press.
Inequality and Political Consensus.Hans Peter Grüner - 2009 - Theory and Decision 67 (3):239-265.
The Pareto Argument for Inequality.G. A. Cohen - 1995 - Social Philosophy and Policy 12 (01):160-185.
The Russian Orthodox Church and The Political Elite.S. B. Filatov - 1994 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 33 (1):77-82.
Globalization: Meaning and Measurement.Charles Wolf - 2000 - Critical Review 14 (1):1-10.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-09-15

Total downloads
206 ( #24,458 of 2,263,108 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
98 ( #2,949 of 2,263,108 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature