Historical Social Research 43 (1):210-33 (2018)

Authors
Bert Baumgaertner
University of Idaho
Abstract
John Stuart Mill advocated for increased interactions between individuals of dissenting opinions for the reason that it would improve society. Whether Mill and similar arguments that advocate for opinion diversity are valid depends on background assumptions about the psychology and sociality of individuals. The field of opinion dynamics is a burgeoning testing ground for how different combinations of sociological and psychological facts contribute to phenomena that affect opinion diversity, such as polarization. This paper applies some recent results from the opinion dynamics literature to assess the impacts of the Millian suggestion. The goal is to understand how the scope of the validity of Mill-style arguments depends on plausible assumptions that can be formalized using agent-based models, a common modeling approach in opinion dynamics. The most salient insight is that homophily (increased interactions between like-minded individuals) does not sufficiently explain decreased opinion diversity. Hence, decreasing homophily by increasing interactions between individuals of dissenting opinions is not the simple solution that a Millian-style argument may advocate.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On a Razor's Edge: Evaluating Arguments From Expert Opinion.Douglas Walton - 2014 - Argument and Computation 5 (2-3):139-159.
John Stuart Mill.[author unknown] - 1986 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 20:169-169.
John Stuart Mill.[author unknown] - 1986 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 20:169-169.
Moral y Educación en Stuart Mill: un modo de conjugar diversidad, costumbres y opinión pública.Juan Ramón Fuentes Jiménez - 2010 - Studium Ovetense: Revista Del Instituto Superior de Estudios Teológicos Del Seminario Metropolitano de Oviedo (España) 38:321-341.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-11-17

Total views
13 ( #753,831 of 2,462,870 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #56,656 of 2,462,870 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes