Philosophy and Social Criticism 28 (3):251-296 (2002)

Abstract
In this paper, I offer an immanent critique of John Rawls's theory of justice which seeks to show that Rawls's understanding of his theory of justice as criteriological and contractarian is ultimately incompatible with his claim that the theory is grounded on the primacy of the practical. I agree with Michael Sandel's observation that the Rawlsian theory of justice rests on substantive metaphysical and epistemological claims, in spite of Rawls's assurances to the contrary. But while Sandel argues for even more substantive metaphysical and epistemological commitments, I argue in the opposite direction. Following J. G. Fichte, I argue for a normative theory of society, not based on some particular notion of the good or on some contentious account of what all reasonable persons would agree to, but based only on the radical primacy of the practical, that is, based only on the seemingly empty premise that free beings - precisely because they are free - cannot be imagined in advance as all agreeing to any particular thing at all. Key Words: contractualism • J. G. Fichte • primacy of the practical • Rawls.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/01953702028003811
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 61,064
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Rawlsian Justice.Fabienne Peter - 2009 - In Paul Anand, Prastanta Pattanaik & Clemens Puppe (eds.), Handbook of Rational and Social Choice. Oxford University Press. pp. 433--456.
Rawls and the Problem of Honour.Kevin W. Gray - 2012 - Philosophia 40 (2):213-222.
Contractualism, Reciprocity, and Egalitarian Justice.Jonathan Quong - 2007 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (1):75-105.
Liberalism and the Limits of Justice.Michael Sandel - 2003 - In Derek Matravers & Jonathan E. Pike (eds.), Journal of Philosophy. Routledge, in Association with the Open University. pp. 336-343.
Religious Belief in a Rawlsian Society.Richard L. Fern - 1987 - Journal of Religious Ethics 15 (1):33 - 58.
A Contradiction in the Egalitarian Theory of Justice.Michael W. Howard - 1984 - Philosophy Research Archives 10:35-55.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
30 ( #356,679 of 2,439,673 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #282,463 of 2,439,673 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes