Regularity theories reassessed

Philosophia 36 (3):327-354 (2008)
Abstract
For a long time, regularity accounts of causation have virtually vanished from the scene. Problems encountered within other theoretical frameworks have recently induced authors working on causation, laws of nature, or methodologies of causal reasoning – as e.g. May (Kausales Schliessen. Eine Untersuchung über kausale Erklärungen und Theorienbildung. Ph.D. thesis, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, 1999), Ragin (Fuzzy-set social science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000), Graßhoff and May (Causal regularities. In W. Spohn, M. Ledwig, & M. Esfeld (Eds.), Current issues in causation (pp. 85–114). Paderborn: Mentis, 2001), Swartz (The concept of physical law (2nd ed.). http://www.sfu.ca/philosophy/physical-law/, 2003), Halpin (Erkenntnis, 58, 137–168, 2003) – to direct their attention back to regularity theoretic analyses. In light of the latest proposals of regularity theories, the paper at hand therefore reassesses the criticism raised against regularity accounts since the INUS theory of causation of Mackie (The cement of the universe. A study of causation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1974). It is shown that most of these objections target strikingly over-simplified regularity theoretic sketches. By outlining ways to refute these objections it is argued that the prevalent conviction as to the overall failure of regularity theories has been hasty.
Keywords Causation  Regularity theory  Determinism  David Hume  John L. Mackie
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11406-007-9114-4
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,150
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Essays on Actions and Events.Donald Davidson - 1980 - Oxford University Press.
What is a Law of Nature?D. M. Armstrong - 1983 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Mechanistic Constitution in Neurobiological Explanations.Jens Harbecke - 2010 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (3):267-285.
A Theory of Non-Universal Laws.Alexander Reutlinger - 2011 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (2):97 - 117.
The Causal Chain Problem.Michael Baumgartner - 2008 - Erkenntnis 69 (2):201-226.

View all 21 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Hume on Causation.Helen Beebee - 2006 - Routledge.
Deterministic Causation.Wolfgang Spohn - 2001 - In Wolfgang Spohn, Marion Ledwig & Michael Esfeld (eds.), Current Issues in Causation. Mentis. pp. 21-46.
A Partial Theory of Actual Causation.Brad Weslake - forthcoming - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
Seeing Causing.Helen Beebee - 2003 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 103 (3):257-280.
Salmon, Statistics, and Backwards Causation.David Papineau - 1978 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:302-313.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

392 ( #6,061 of 2,152,226 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

14 ( #35,566 of 2,152,226 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums