Southwest Philosophy Review 35 (1):59-68 (2019)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
A core feature of teleosemantic proposals has been to rely on selective history to justify semantic functional classification. Recently, Nanay and Bauer have offered ahistorical teleosemantic proposals intended to bypass the numerous criticisms arising from the dependence on history. However, part of the attraction of the traditional reliance on history is that it seemingly allowed teleosemantics to mesh with biological practice. For example, Millikan, a key advocate for the selective historical approach, argues that biological kind identity rests on historical relations. That would seem to place ahistorical teleosemantics directly at odds with biological practice. I suggest that ahistorical teleosemantics need not conflict with biological practice. This reflects the fact that biological inquiry combines two complimentary explanatory strategies, essentialist and populational reasoning. The complementary character of these strategies allows ahistorical teleosemantics, as an instance of essentialism, to integrate with populational reasoning without conflict.
|
Keywords | Conference Proceedings Contemporary Philosophy General Interest Essentialism Teleosemantics Ahistorical teleosemantics |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | 0897-2346 |
DOI | 10.5840/swphilreview20193516 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Psychological Essentialism and Semantic Externalism: Evidence for Externalism in Lay Speakers' Language Use.Jussi Jylkk - 2009 - Philosophical Psychology 22 (1):37 – 60.
How Scientific Is Scientific Essentialism?Muhammad Ali Khalidi - 2009 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 40 (1):85-101.
Essentialism in Quantified Modal Logic.Thomas J. McKay - 1975 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 4 (4):423 - 438.
Topological Essentialism.Roberto Casati & Achille C. Varzi - 2000 - Philosophical Studies 100 (3):217-236.
What's Wrong with the New Biological Essentialism.Marc Ereshefsky - 2010 - Philosophy of Science 77 (5):674-685.
Comments on Klima, Contemporary "Essentialism" Vs. Aristotelian Essentialism.Michael Kremer - manuscript
Cultural Transmission of Social Essentialism.Marjorie Rhodes, Sarah-Jane Leslie & Christina Tworek - 2012 - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 (34):13526-13531.
Mapping Semantic Paths: Is Essentialism Relevant?William R. Carter - 1986 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 11 (1):53-73.
Quiddity and Haecceity as Distinct Forms of Essentialism.Bruce Hood - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (5):492-493.
Modern Materialism and Essentialism.James D. Carney & P. von Bretzel - 1973 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 51 (1):78-81.
Sorting Out the Sortals: A Fregean Argument for Essentialism.Troy T. Catterson - 2015 - Erkenntnis 80 (1):137-157.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2019-05-05
Total views
12 ( #756,151 of 2,411,839 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #538,761 of 2,411,839 )
2019-05-05
Total views
12 ( #756,151 of 2,411,839 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #538,761 of 2,411,839 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads