Stability of risk preferences and the reflection effect of prospect theory

Theory and Decision 68 (1-2):193-211 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Are risk preferences stable over time? To address this question we elicit risk preferences from the same pool of subjects at two different moments in time. To interpret the results, we use a Fechner stochastic choice model in which the revealed preference of individuals is governed by some underlying preference, together with a random error. We take cumulative prospect theory as the underlying preference model (Kahneman and Tversky, Econometrica 47:263–292, 1979; Tversky and Kahneman, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5:297–323, 1992). We observe that the aggregate pattern of preferences is very similar in both sessions, and it matches the results reported in the literature. Most subjects are risk averse for gains, and risk seeking for losses. However, the subjects that jointly agree with the reflection effect of prospect theory are around 50%. The percentage of individuals that change their responses across sessions is quite high, 63%. Estimating the stochastic choice model we find that 72% of the subjects have an underlying preference which agrees with the reflection effect of prospect theory. The remaining 28% are mainly classified as risk averse for both gains and losses. The results reinforce the empirical validity of the reflection effect. Deviations from the reflection effect can be attributed to noise, as well as to the existence of a fraction of risk averse subjects

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Common Ratio Using Delay.Manel Baucells & Franz H. Heukamp - 2010 - Theory and Decision 68 (1-2):149-158.
On Risk and Rationality.Brad Armendt - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (S6):1-9.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
104 (#117,409)

6 months
1 (#415,205)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Intransitivity of Preferences.Amos Tversky - 1969 - Psychological Review 76 (1):31-48.
The Construction of Preference.Sarah Lichtenstein & Paul Slovic (eds.) - 2006 - Cambridge University Press.
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk.D. Kahneman & A. Tversky - 1979 - Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society:263--291.

Add more references