The Monoamine Oxidase A (MAOA) Genetic Predisposition to Impulsive Violence: Is It Relevant to Criminal Trials?

Neuroethics 6 (2):287-306 (2013)

In Italy, a judge reduced the sentence of a defendant by 1 year in response to evidence for a genetic predisposition to violence. The best characterized of these genetic differences, those in the monoamine oxidase A (MAOA), were cited as especially relevant. Several months previously in the USA, MAOA data contributed to a jury reducing charges from 1st degree murder (a capital offence) to voluntary manslaughter. Is there a rational basis for this type of use of MAOA evidence in criminal court? This paper will review in context recent work on the MAOA gene–environment interaction in predisposing individuals to violence and address the relevance of such findings to murder trials. Interestingly, the MAOA genetic variants impact future violence and aggression only when combined with the adverse environmental stimuli of childhood maltreatment. Thus nature and nurture interact to determine the individual’s risk. Based on current evidence, I argue there is a weak case for mitigation. But should future experiments confirm the hypothesis that individual differences in impulse control and response to provocation found in MAOA-L men (without abuse) are significantly magnified when combined with childhood maltreatment, the case could turn into a stronger one
Keywords Violence  Genetic predisposition  MAOA  Monoamine Oxidase A  Criminal responsibility  Neuroethics  Gene × environment interaction
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s12152-011-9108-6
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,149
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Public Opinion.Charles E. Merriam - 1946 - Philosophical Review 55:497.
Genetic Differences and Human Identities.Erik Parens - 2004 - Hastings Center Report 34 (S1):4-35.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Some Reflections on Sex Differences in Aggression and Violence.Stephen C. Maxson - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):232-233.
Interactive Predispositions.James Tabery - 2009 - Philosophy of Science 76 (5):876-888.
Genes, Electrotransmitters, and Free Will.Patricia S. Greenspan - 2001 - In Patricia S. Greenspan, David Wasserman & Robert Wachbroit (eds.), Genetics and Criminal Behavior: Methods, Meanings, and Morals. Cambridge University Press.
The Paradox of Terrorism in Civil War.Stathis N. Kalyvas - 2004 - The Journal of Ethics 8 (1):97-138.


Added to PP index

Total views
173 ( #47,222 of 2,289,436 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
31 ( #28,311 of 2,289,436 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature