Was Hegel an Authoritarian Thinker? Reading Hegel’s Philosophy of History on the Basis of his Metaphysics

Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 103 (1):120-147 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

With Hegel’s metaphysics attracting renewed attention, it is time to address a long-standing criticism: Scholars from Marx to Popper and Habermas have worried that Hegel’s metaphysics has anti-individualist and authoritarian implications, which are particularly pronounced in his Philosophy of History, since Hegel identifies historical progress with reason imposing itself on individuals. Rather than proposing an alternative non-metaphysical conception of reason, as Pippin or Brandom have done, this article argues that critics are broadly right in their metaphysical reading of Hegel’s central concepts. However, they are mistaken about what Hegel’s approach entails, when one examines the specific types of states discussed by the philosopher in his Philosophy of History. Even on a traditional metaphysical reading, Hegel is not only non-authoritarian; he also makes a powerful argument concerning freedom, whereupon the freest society involves collective oversight and the shaping of social structures so as to ensure that they benefit everybody.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-05-02

Downloads
1,299 (#11,312)

6 months
311 (#5,901)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Charlotte Baumann
Fernuniversität Hagen

References found in this work

Reason in philosophy: animating ideas.Robert Brandom - 2009 - Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
The Open Society and its Enemies.Karl R. Popper - 1952 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 142:629-634.

View all 40 references / Add more references