Grazer Philosophische Studien 79 (1):159-186 (2009)
Alvin Goldman develops the concept of “core voter knowledge” to capture the kind of knowledge that voters need to have in order that democracy function successfully. As democracy is supposed to promote the people's goals, core voter knowledge must, according to Goldman, first and foremost answer the question which electoral candidate would successfully perform in achieving that voter's ends. In our paper we challenge this concept of core voter knowledge from different angles. We analyse the dimensions of political trustworthiness and their relevance for the voter; we contrast two alternative orientations that the voter might take—an “outcome-orientation” and a “process-orientation”; and we discuss how an expressive account of voting behaviour would shift the focus in regard to the content of voter knowledge. Finally, we discuss some varieties of epistemic trust and their relevance for the availability, acquisition and dissemination of voter knowledge in a democracy.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Epistemic Trust and Liberal Justification.Michael Fuerstein - 2013 - Journal of Political Philosophy 21 (2):179-199.
Similar books and articles
Critique of Caplan's The Myth of the Rational Voter. [REVIEW]Stuart Farrand - 2010 - Libertarian Papers 2:28.
A Shortcut Method of Calculating the Distribution of Election Outcome Types Under Approval Voting.Miles H. Sonstegaard - 1998 - Theory and Decision 44 (3):211-220.
Democracy and Voter Ignorance Revisited: Rejoinder to Ciepley.Ilya Somin - 2000 - Critical Review 14 (1):99-111.
Democracy Despite Voter Ignorance: A Weberian Reply to Somin and Friedman.David Ciepley - 1999 - Critical Review 13 (1-2):191-227.
Added to index2010-01-16
Total downloads48 ( #109,995 of 2,178,178 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #73,172 of 2,178,178 )
How can I increase my downloads?