Kriterion: Journal of Philosophy 50 (119):63-92 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX


New settings for communication are being built, having, at one side, great corporations of television, radio, press and on line media, and at the other side the role of the independent / alternative press, understood as not bound to a private, public or state enterprise or to some economic group. It takes gradually shape the constitution of the opposition between the traditional media and the independent / alternative press, having as a material base the new technologies of information. How can the new technology of information associated to the new settings of press freedom and the phenomenon of the contradiction of public opinion in the era of internet accomplish the mediation of the opinion in a globalized society? Or still, starting from the presupposition of the press freedom, how to guarantee that the society solves the contradiction of the public opinion? The phenomenon of the public opinion is contradicting because it has in itself, at the same time, the universality of constitutional principles of Law and Ethics, together with the peculiarity of the citizens’ rights and concerns. This contradiction finds its solution by means of the mediation of the freedom of the press itself within a frame of democratic legality. This is the power of the contradiction: to put into effect the dialectic tension between the opposed poles of the universal and the particular in the press freedom, avowing the right of every citizen to express publicly his opinion. This is Hegel’s theory of public opinion: the press freedom and the parliament, as a politic space, are privileged spheres of the mediation of the contradictory phenomenon of the public opinion. Keywords: Press freedom; public opinion; press; citizen journalists.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The public's right to know: A dangerous notion.Brian Richardson - 2004 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 19 (1):46 – 55.
What is public opinion?Eric R. A. N. Smith - 1996 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 10 (1):95-105.
What wrongdoers deserve: the moral reasoning behind responses to misconduct.R. Murray Thomas - 1993 - Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press. Edited by Ann Diver-Stamnes.
Public space.James Mensch - 2007 - Continental Philosophy Review 40 (1):31-47.
Bentham, Kant, and the right to communicate.Slavko Splichal - 2003 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 15 (3-4):285-305.
Public opinion, elites, and democracy.Robert Y. Shapiro - 1998 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 12 (4):501-528.
Democratic politics and survey research.Lynn M. Sanders - 1999 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 29 (2):248-280.


Added to PP

52 (#313,595)

6 months
10 (#306,545)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Agemir Bavaresco
Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references