Kriterion: Journal of Philosophy 50 (119):63-92 (2009)
New settings for communication are being built, having, at one side, great corporations of television, radio, press and on line media, and at the other side the role of the independent / alternative press, understood as not bound to a private, public or state enterprise or to some economic group. It takes gradually shape the constitution of the opposition between the traditional media and the independent / alternative press, having as a material base the new technologies of information. How can the new technology of information associated to the new settings of press freedom and the phenomenon of the contradiction of public opinion in the era of internet accomplish the mediation of the opinion in a globalized society? Or still, starting from the presupposition of the press freedom, how to guarantee that the society solves the contradiction of the public opinion? The phenomenon of the public opinion is contradicting because it has in itself, at the same time, the universality of constitutional principles of Law and Ethics, together with the peculiarity of the citizens’ rights and concerns. This contradiction finds its solution by means of the mediation of the freedom of the press itself within a frame of democratic legality. This is the power of the contradiction: to put into effect the dialectic tension between the opposed poles of the universal and the particular in the press freedom, avowing the right of every citizen to express publicly his opinion. This is Hegel’s theory of public opinion: the press freedom and the parliament, as a politic space, are privileged spheres of the mediation of the contradictory phenomenon of the public opinion. Keywords: Press freedom; public opinion; press; citizen journalists.
|Keywords||Press freedom public opinion press citizen journalists.|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Public's Right to Know: A Dangerous Notion.Brian Richardson - 2004 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 19 (1):46 – 55.
Right to Know, Press Freedom, Public Discourse.Cummins Gauthier Candace - 1999 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 14 (4):197-212.
Public Journalism and the Prospects for Press Accountability.Theodore L. Glasser & Stephanie Craft - 1996 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 11 (3):152 – 158.
What Wrongdoers Deserve: The Moral Reasoning Behind Responses to Misconduct.R. Murray Thomas - 1993 - Greenwood Press.
Power — the Key to Press Freedom: A Four-Tiered Social Model.David Gordon & John C. Merrill - 1988 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 3 (1):38 – 49.
Los papeles periódicos y el espacio público. En torno a la legitimidad de las funciones cognitivas del espacio público.María G. Navarro - 2011 - Praxis Filosófica 33:227-242.
Bentham, Kant, and the Right to Communicate.Slavko Splichal - 2003 - Critical Review 15 (3-4):285-305.
Beyond Choice: Reproductive Freedom in the 21st Century.Alexander Sanger - 2004 - Public Affairs.
The Arab Street: Tracking a Political Metaphor.Muhammad Ali Khalidi - 2009 - Middle East Journal 63 (1):11-29.
Added to index2010-09-11
Total downloads15 ( #312,813 of 2,164,577 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #128,912 of 2,164,577 )
How can I increase my downloads?