Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia 50 (119):63-92 (2009)
New settings for communication are being built, having, at one side, great corporations of television, radio, press and on line media, and at the other side the role of the independent / alternative press, understood as not bound to a private, public or state enterprise or to some economic group. It takes gradually shape the constitution of the opposition between the traditional media and the independent / alternative press, having as a material base the new technologies of information. How can the new technology of information associated to the new settings of press freedom and the phenomenon of the contradiction of public opinion in the era of internet accomplish the mediation of the opinion in a globalized society? Or still, starting from the presupposition of the press freedom, how to guarantee that the society solves the contradiction of the public opinion? The phenomenon of the public opinion is contradicting because it has in itself, at the same time, the universality of constitutional principles of Law and Ethics, together with the peculiarity of the citizens’ rights and concerns. This contradiction finds its solution by means of the mediation of the freedom of the press itself within a frame of democratic legality. This is the power of the contradiction: to put into effect the dialectic tension between the opposed poles of the universal and the particular in the press freedom, avowing the right of every citizen to express publicly his opinion. This is Hegel’s theory of public opinion: the press freedom and the parliament, as a politic space, are privileged spheres of the mediation of the contradictory phenomenon of the public opinion. Keywords: Press freedom; public opinion; press; citizen journalists.
Keywords Press freedom  public opinion  press   citizen journalists.
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1590/S0100-512X2009000100004
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,370
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Public's Right to Know: A Dangerous Notion.Brian Richardson - 2004 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 19 (1):46 – 55.
Right to Know, Press Freedom, Public Discourse.Cummins Gauthier Candace - 1999 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 14 (4):197-212.
What is Public Opinion?Eric R. A. N. Smith - 1996 - Critical Review 10 (1):95-105.
Public Space.James Mensch - 2007 - Continental Philosophy Review 40 (1):31-47.
Bentham, Kant, and the Right to Communicate.Slavko Splichal - 2003 - Critical Review 15 (3-4):285-305.
Public Opinion, Elites, and Democracy.Robert Y. Shapiro - 1998 - Critical Review 12 (4):501-528.
Democratic Politics and Survey Research.Lynn M. Sanders - 1999 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 29 (2):248-280.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
18 ( #277,827 of 2,193,768 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #95,978 of 2,193,768 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature