Corporeal Substances and True Unities: Abstract

The Leibniz Review 4 (2):9-10 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the correspondence with Arnauld, Leibniz contends that each corporeal substance has a substantial form. In support he argues that to be real a corporeal substance must be one and indivisible, a true unity. I will show how this argument precludes a tempting interpretation of corporeal substances as composite unities. Rather it mandates the interpretation that each corporeal substance is a single monad.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Unity and Simple Substance in Leibniz.Samuel Levey - 2007 - The Leibniz Review 17:61-106.
Aquinas on the Individuation of Non-Living Substances.Christopher M. Brown - 2001 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:237-254.
Descartes and Individual Corporeal Substance.Edward Slowik - 2001 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 9 (1):1 – 15.
Aquinas on the Soul: Substantial Form and Subsistent Entity.Linda P. Jenks - 1985 - Dissertation, University of California, Irvine

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
83 (#151,896)

6 months
25 (#52,622)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Donald L. M. Baxter
University of Connecticut

Citations of this work

Replies to Perry, Falkenstein, and Garrett. [REVIEW]Donald L. M. Baxter - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 146 (3):445 - 455.
Corporeal Substances and True Unities.Donald L. M. Baxter - 1995 - Studia Leibnitiana 27 (2):157.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references