Character, purpose, and criminal responsibility

Law and Philosophy 1 (1):5 - 20 (1982)
This paper explores analyzing criminal responsibility from the Humean position that blame is for character traits. If untoward acts indicate undesirable character traits, then the agent is blameworthy; if they do not, then the actor is not blameworthy — he has an excuse. A distinctive feature of this approach is that that voluntariness of acts is irrelevant to determining blameworthiness.This analysis is then applied to a variety of issues in criminal law. Mens supports inferences to character traits, and the Humean approach provides a reason for rejeting strict criminal liability. The Humean approach also helps resolve a number of issues about attempts, such as punishment for impossible attempts and the defense of abandonment. It also supports the broad outlines of the defense of mistake and provides a third alternative in the Wooton-Hart debate over punishment and treatment.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00143144
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,188
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Making Room for Hate Crime Legislation in Liberal Societies.Mohamad Al-Hakim - 2010 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (3):341-358.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

69 ( #74,099 of 2,154,070 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

6 ( #119,685 of 2,154,070 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums