Google and Facebook Vs Rawls and Lao-Tzu: How Silicon Valley’s Utilitarianism and Confucianism Are Bad for Internet Ethics

AoIR 2020: The 21th Annual Conference of the Association of Internet Researchers (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The proposed paper presents an argument in favor of a Rawlsian approach to ethics for Internet technology companies (den Hoven & Rooksby, 2008; Hoffman, 2017). Ethics statements from such companies are analyzed and shown to be utilitarian and teleological in nature, and therefore in opposition to Rawls’ theories of justice and fairness. The statements are also shown to have traits in common with Confucian virtue ethics (Ames, 2011; Nylan, 2008).

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Four Pillars of Internet Research Ethics with Web 2.0.Barry Rooke - 2013 - Journal of Academic Ethics 11 (4):265-268.
Silicon Valley’s Next Generation of Entrepreneurs.Martin Calkins - 2002 - The Ruffin Series of the Society for Business Ethics 3:209-218.
Rawls’s Self-Defeat: A Formal Analysis.Hun Chung - 2020 - Erkenntnis 85 (5):1169-1197.
Public Relations and Rawls: An Ill-Fitting Veil to Wear.Chris Roberts - 2012 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 27 (3):163-176.
Searching for Philosophy. [REVIEW]Anthony F. Beavers - 2005 - Teaching Philosophy 28 (4):367-371.
Rawls and Environmental Ethics.Daniel P. Thero - 1995 - Environmental Ethics 17 (1):93-106.
Rawls on the practicability of utilitarianism.Ivar Labukt - 2009 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8 (2):201-221.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-08

Downloads
477 (#38,337)

6 months
98 (#41,170)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?