In defence of genethical parity

In David Archard & David Benatar (eds.), Procreation and Parenthood: The Ethics of Bearing and Rearing Children. Oxford University Press (2010)

Authors
Tim Bayne
Monash University
Abstract
Can a person be harmed or wronged by being brought into existence? Can a person be benefited by being brought into existence? Following David Heyd, I refer to these questions as “genethical questions”. This chapter examines three broad approaches to genethics: the no-faults model, the dual-benchmark model, and the parity model. The no-faults model holds that coming into existence is not properly subject to moral evaluation, at least so far as the interests of the person that is to be brought into existence are concerned. The dual benchmark model allows that coming into existence can be subject to moral evaluation, but holds that our judgments about the kinds of lives worth starting ought not be aligned with our judgments about the kinds of lives worth sustaining. I argue against both the no-faults and dual benchmark models. In their place, I argue for a parity approach to genethics, according to which our judgments about the conditions under which life is worth creating ought to be constrained by our judgments about the conditions under which life is worth continuing.
Keywords David Beneatar  Procreation  Non-Identity Problem  Birth  Wrongful Life
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Parity Demystified.Erik Carlson - 2010 - Theoria 76 (2):119-128.
Varieties of Parity.Ulrich E. Stegmann - 2012 - Biology and Philosophy 27 (6):903-918.
Parity, Interval Value, and Choice.Ruth Chang - 2005 - Ethics 115 (2):331-350.
Reflections on Parity Nonconservation.Nick Huggett - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (2):219-241.
The Mere Addition Paradox, Parity and Critical Level Utilitarianism.Mozaffar Qizilbash - 2002 - School of Economic and Social Studies, University of East Anglia.
Parity Still Isn't a Generalisation Problem.R. I. Damper - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):307-308.
The Parity View and Intuitions of Neutrality.Mozaffar Qizilbash - 2007 - Economics and Philosophy 23 (1):107-114.
By Parity of Reasoning.John Woods & Brent Hudak - 1989 - Informal Logic 11 (3).
Parity of Participation and the Politics of Status.Chris Armstrong & Simon Thompson - 2009 - European Journal of Political Theory 8 (1):109-122.
The Mere Addition Paradox, Parity and Vagueness.Mozaffar Qizilbash - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (1):129–151.
The Possibility of Parity.Ruth Chang - 2002 - Ethics 112 (4):659-688.
Humans Not Instruments.Harry Collins - 2010 - Spontaneous Generations 4 (1):138-147.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-04-03

Total views
49 ( #159,832 of 2,242,939 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #33,303 of 2,242,939 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature