Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 41 (4):415-421 (2000)
AbstractYou’ll be pleased to know that I don’t intend to use these remarks to comment on all of the papers presented at this conference. I won’t try to show that one paper was right about this topic, that another was wrong was about that topic, or that several of our conference participants were talking past one another. Nor will I try to adjudicate any of the discussions which took place in between our sessions. Instead, I’ll use these remarks to make two simple points: one about logicism in the 20th century and one about neo-logicism here at the start of the 21st.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Frege Meets Dedekind: A Neologicist Treatment of Real Analysis.Stewart Shapiro - 2000 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 41 (4):335--364.
Neo-Fregean Foundations for Real Analysis: Some Reflections on Frege's Constraint.Crispin Wright - 2000 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 41 (4):317--334.
Citations of this work
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
What is the Purpose of Neo-Logicism?Marcus Rossberg & Philip A. Ebert - 2007 - Traveaux de Logique 18:33-61.
Russell’s Reasons for Logicism.Ian Proops - 2006 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (2):267-292.
Ed Zalta's Version of Neo-Logicism: A Friendly Letter of Complaint.Philip A. Ebert & Marcus Rossberg - 2009 - In Hannes Leitgeb & Alexander Hieke (eds.), Reduction – Abstraction – Analysis. Ontos. pp. 11--305.