Automatic and polynomial-time algebraic structures

Journal of Symbolic Logic 84 (4):1630-1669 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A structure is automatic if its domain, functions, and relations are all regular languages. Using the fact that every automatic structure is decidable, in the literature many decision problems have been solved by giving an automatic presentation of a particular structure. Khoussainov and Nerode asked whether there is some way to tell whether a structure has, or does not have, an automatic presentation. We answer this question by showing that the set of Turing machines that represent automata-presentable structures is ${\rm{\Sigma }}_1^1 $-complete. We also use similar methods to show that there is no reasonable characterisation of the structures with a polynomial-time presentation in the sense of Nerode and Remmel.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,006

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-04-30

Downloads
24 (#751,165)

6 months
6 (#1,127,942)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Punctual definability on structures.Iskander Kalimullin, Alexander Melnikov & Antonio Montalban - 2021 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 172 (8):102987.
Categorical linearly ordered structures.Rod Downey, Alexander Melnikov & Keng Meng Ng - 2019 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 170 (10):1243-1255.
Online, computable and punctual structure theory.Matthew Askes & Rod Downey - 2023 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 31 (6):1251-1293.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references