Journal of Political Philosophy 18 (1):32-63 (2010)
Authors | |
Abstract |
IN the last decade deliberative democracy has developed rapidly from a
“theoretical statement” into a “working theory.”1 Scholars and practitioners have launched numerous initiatives designed to put deliberative democracy into practice, ranging from deliberative polling to citizen summits.2 Some even advocate deliberation as a new “revolutionary now.”3 Deliberative democracy has also experienced the beginning of an empirical turn, making significant gains as an empirical (or positive) political science. This includes a small, but growing body of literature tackling the connection between the normative standards of deliberation, how well they are met, and the empirical consequences of meeting them.4 This trend has, for instance, included the use of methods and frameworks borrowed from other fields, such as political and social
psychology. Such studies suggest that cases approaching ideal deliberation are rare, but that group interaction sometimes works surprisingly well according to such ideals.5.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00342.x |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy.Jürgen Habermas (ed.) - 1996 - Polity.
View all 32 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Survey Article: Deliberation, Democracy, and the Systemic Turn.David Owen & Graham Smith - 2015 - Journal of Political Philosophy 23 (2):213-234.
Deliberation and Disagreement: Problem Solving, Prediction, and Positive Dissensus.Hélène Landemore & Scott E. Page - 2015 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 14 (3):229-254.
Talk Ain’T Cheap: Political CSR and the Challenges of Corporate Deliberation.Cameron Sabadoz & Abraham Singer - 2017 - Business Ethics Quarterly 27 (2):183-211.
On Traditional African Consensual Rationality.Emmanuel Ifeanyi Ani - 2014 - Journal of Political Philosophy 22 (3):342-365.
A Deliberative Model of Intra‐Party Democracy.Fabio Wolkenstein - 2016 - Journal of Political Philosophy 24 (3):297-320.
View all 24 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Blind Spots in the Toleration Literature.John Christian Laursen - 2011 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (3):307-322.
Deliberative Democracy and the Epistemic Benefits of Diversity.James Bohman - 2006 - Episteme 3 (3):175-191.
Liberal Democracy and the Challenge of Ethical Diversity.Enzo Rossi - 2008 - Human Affairs 18 (1):10-22.
Foundations and Frontiers of Deliberative Governance.John S. Dryzek - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Ethical Blind-Spots: Why Socrates Was Not a Cosmopolitan.Timothy Chappell - 2010 - Ratio 23 (1):17-33.
Does Public Ignorance Defeat Deliberative Democracy?Robert B. Talisse - 2004 - Critical Review 16 (4):455-463.
From Pragmatism to Perfectionism: Cheryl Misak's Epistemic Deliberativism.Robert B. Talisse - 2007 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (3):387-406.
Deliberative Democracy and Nanotechnology.Colin Farrelly - forthcoming - Nanoethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Nanotechnology.
Blind Spots and Clinical Training.Michael Paul Melendez - 1995 - Ethics and Behavior 5 (4):359 – 367.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-06-04
Total views
202 ( #45,393 of 2,403,826 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #40,192 of 2,403,826 )
2009-06-04
Total views
202 ( #45,393 of 2,403,826 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #40,192 of 2,403,826 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads