Phronesis 54 (2):101-135 (2009)
For Aristotle the fallacy of accident arises from mistakes about being per accidens and not from accidental predication. Mistakes in perceiving per accidens come from our judgements about being per accidens and so commit that fallacy. Practical syllogisms have the same formal structure as being and perceiving per accidens . Moreover perceiving per accidens typically provides the minor premise for the practical syllogism as it makes it possible for us to know singular propositions, especially those about substances. Thus these minor premises may come about through fallacious reasoning, what today would be called reasoning via collateral information. On account of these foundations for the practical syllogism, even a person of practical wisdom will need a lot of luck to avoid mistakes.
|Keywords||FALLACY OF ACCIDENT PRACTICAL SYLLOGISM PER ACCIDENS PERCEPTION|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Educating for Practical Reasoning.Thomas Magnell - 2001 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 11:233-239.
Reconstructing Aristotle: The Practical Syllogism.John R. Welch - 1991 - Philosophia 21 (1-2):69-88.
Lotteries, Knowledge, and Practical Reasoning.Rachel McKinnon - 2011 - Logos and Episteme 2 (2):225-231.
Added to index2009-04-15
Total downloads65 ( #78,593 of 2,154,091 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #184,428 of 2,154,091 )
How can I increase my downloads?