Alina Beary
Biola University
From experience, we know that some cognitive processes are effortless and automatic, while others are hard and deliberate. Dual process accounts of human cognition explain these differences by positing two qualitatively distinct types of cognitive processes within the human mind—types that cannot be reduced to each other. Because DP constructs are bound to show up in discourse on human cognition, decision-making, morality, and character formation, moral philosophers should take DP accounts seriously. Here, I provide an overview of the current state of DP accounts—their basic tenets, major concepts, and the various models of the DP framework—and note some of its more salient criticisms from the psychological research community. Finally, I show that DP accounts’ commitment to a real qualitative distinction between rational and non-rational human behavior puts them at odds with a Thomistic/Aristotelian view of practical rationality.
Keywords Catholic Tradition  Contemporary Philosophy  History of Philosophy  Philosophy and Religion
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/acpq202221250
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,214
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Platonic Philosophy of Religion: A Process Perspective. [REVIEW]Daniel Tomulet - 2010 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 84 (1):172-175.
Process, Praxis and Transcendence. [REVIEW]Michael D. Barber - 2001 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 75 (3):454-459.
The Will: A Dual Aspect Theory. [REVIEW]John J. Davenport - 2011 - International Philosophical Quarterly 51 (2):259-264.
The Justification of Lonergan’s Cognitional and Volitional Process.Stephen Wentworth Arndt - 1991 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 65 (1):45-61.
Natural Law Theory: Contemporary Essays. [REVIEW]Patrick Lee - 1998 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 72 (1):136-137.
Desiring the Good: Ancient Proposals and Contemporary Theory. By Katja Maria Vogt.Michael J. Degnan - 2019 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 93 (3):583-585.
Reconstituting Praxis: Toward a Sartrean Theory of History.Thomas R. Flynn - 1996 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 70 (4):597-618.
Review of God, Philosophy, Universities. [REVIEW]Mathew Lu - 2010 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 84 (3):638-640.
Reenchantment Without Supernaturalism: A Process Philosophy of Religion. [REVIEW]George Allan - 2004 - International Philosophical Quarterly 44 (1):113-115.
The Thomist Tradition (Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy of Religion, 2).Glenn Chicoine - 2008 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 82 (2):380-383.
Natural Law Theory.Patrick Lee - 1998 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 72 (1):136-137.
Is Thomas’s Natural Law Theory Naturalist?Patrick Lee - 1997 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 71 (4):567-587.


Added to PP index

Total views
3 ( #1,358,205 of 2,507,637 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,530 of 2,507,637 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes