Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (3):547-557 (2012)
A common and much-explored thought is ?ukasiewicz's idea that the future is ?indeterminate??i.e., ?gappy? with respect to some claims?and that such indeterminacy bleeds back into the present in the form of gappy ?future contingent? claims. What is uncommon, and to my knowledge unexplored, is the dual idea of an overdeterminate future?one which is ?glutty? with respect to some claims. While the direct dual, with future gluts bleeding back into the present, is worth noting, my central aim is simply to sketch and briefly explore an alternative glutty-future view, one that is conservative?indeed, entirely classical?with respect to the present. The structure of the paper runs as follows. ?1 briefly sketches the target gap picture of an indeterminate future yielding gappy claims at the present. ?2 presents the direct dual idea?a glut picture of an overdeterminate future yielding glutty claims at present. ?3 sketches the central idea, a more interesting glut picture in which the future contains contradictory states but the present remains entirely classical. ?4 contains a general defence of the idea, leaving it open as to whether the gappy-future view enjoys substantive virtues over the proposed glutty-future view of ?3
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Neccessity, Vol. I.Alan R. Anderson & Nuel D. Belnap - 1975 - Princeton University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Presentism, Non-Presentism and the Possibility of Time Travel.David Chico & Juan Colomina - 1st ed. 2015 - In Antonio Manuel Liz Gutiérrez & Margarita Vázquez Campos (eds.), Temporal Points of View. Springer Verlag.
Partial and Paraconsistent Approaches to Future Contingents in Tense Logic.Seiki Akama, Tetsuya Murai & Yasuo Kudo - forthcoming - Synthese:1-11.
Similar books and articles
Past, Present, Future, and Special Relativity.Natasa Rakic - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (2):257-280.
Judging the Future: Whose Fault Will It Be?Daniel Callahan - 2000 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (6):677 – 687.
Probability and the Open Future View.Alexander R. Pruss - 2010 - Faith and Philosophy 27 (2):190-196.
On How to Interpret the Role of the Future Within the Abortion Debate.Ezio Di Nucci - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (10):651-652.
Added to index2011-10-04
Total downloads108 ( #45,620 of 2,163,974 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #84,084 of 2,163,974 )
How can I increase my downloads?