God of the gaps: a neglected reply to God’s stone problem

Analysis 77 (4):681-689 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Traditional monotheism has long faced logical puzzles. We argue that such puzzles rest on the assumed logical truth of the Law of Excluded Middle, which we suggest there is little theological reason to accept. By way of illustration we focus on God's alleged stone problem, and present a simple but plausible ‘gappy’ framework for addressing this puzzle. We assume familiarity with the proposed logic but an appendix is offered as a brief review.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,363

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Stone's Evidential Atheism: A Critique.Timothy Pawl - 2013 - Faith and Philosophy 30 (3):317-329.
The new paradox of the stone revisited.Erik J. Wielenberg - 2001 - Faith and Philosophy 18 (2):261-268.
El silencio del derecho.Eugenio Bulygin - 2002 - Análisis Filosófico 22 (2):103-114.
Why Bohm's theory solves the measurement problem.Tim Maudlin - 1995 - Philosophy of Science 62 (3):479-483.
A stone-age anthropologist looks at Tucson III'.Tjiniman Murinbata & Charles Whitehead - 1998 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 5 (4):504-507.
The problem of material constitution.Michael C. Rea - 1995 - Philosophical Review 104 (4):525-552.
The Metaphysics of Material Constitution.Michael Cannon Rea - 1996 - Dissertation, University of Notre Dame

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-06-28

Downloads
110 (#114,901)

6 months
11 (#82,816)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

A. J. Cotnoir
University of St. Andrews
Jc Beall
University of Notre Dame

References found in this work

Summa Theologica.Thomasn D. Aquinas - 1274 - Hayes Barton Press.
The Christian God.Richard Swinburne - 1994 - Oxford University Press.
Truth and Paradox: Solving the Riddles.Tim Maudlin - 2004 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
There is no Logical Negation: True, False, Both, and Neither.Jc Beall - 2017 - Australasian Journal of Logic 14 (1):Article no. 1.
Thought and Reality.Michael Dummett - 2006 - Oxford University Press.

View all 17 references / Add more references