The Owl of Minerva 42 (1-2):153-217 (2010)
Dieter Henrich has presented persuasive evidence that Hegel’s logic does not, in practice, provide a linear deduction of logical categories, but rather borrows thought-forms proper to subsequent stages in order to effect its dialectical transitions. In reply, I argue that the presented order of the categories is already implicitly sublated by a deep structure of circularity that determines the development. Thus, Hegel’s dialectic is deliberately nonlinear in terms of both its content and its method. One can therefore acknowledge the astuteness of Henrich’s many insights without regarding them as telling criticisms of the system as Hegel intended it
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Hegel: A Collection of Critical Essays.Alasdair C. MacIntyre - 1972 - University of Notre Dame Press.
Marx's Inferential Commitment to Hegel's Idealism in the Grundrisse.Matthew J. Smetona - 2012 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2):351-372.
Satisfying the Demands of Reason: Hegel's Conceptualization of Experience.Simon Lumsden - 2003 - Topoi 22 (1):41-53.
Hegel and Naturphilosophie.Frederick Beiser - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (1):135-147.
Hegel's Philosophy of Right, with Marx's Commentary: A Handbook for Students.Howard P. Kainz - 1974 - Martinus Nijhoff.
Henrich Dieter, ed., Stuttgarter Hegel-Kongress 1975: 1st systematische Philosophie möglich? Hegel-Studien, Beiheft 17. [REVIEW]George di Giovanni - 1981 - Dialogue 20 (1):178-179.
The Aristotelian-Kantian and Hegelian Approaches to Categories.Chong-Fuk Lau - 2008 - The Owl of Minerva 40 (1):77-114.
Added to index2012-03-18
Total downloads47 ( #111,466 of 2,172,865 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #324,901 of 2,172,865 )
How can I increase my downloads?