Hume on the nonhuman animal

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (4):322 – 335 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Hume wrote about fundamental similarities and dissimilarities between human and nonhuman animals. His work was centered on the cognitive and emotional lives of animals, rather than their moral or legal standing, but his theories have implications for issues of moral standing. The historical background of these controversies reaches to ancient philosophy and to several prominent figures in early modern philosophy. Hume develops several of the themes in this literature. His underlying method is analogical arg ument and his conclusions are generally favorable regarding the abilities in animals. Hume does not attribute a moral sense or capacity of judgment to animals, but he does suggest that their actions exhibit moral qualities, such as other-regarding instincts. Hume allows in-kind differences in both demonstrative reason and moral judgment, but in the domains of both causal reason and moral agency he believes there are differences of degree rather than of kind. Hume's most significant philosophical contribution was to move as far as anyone before him to a naturalistic explanation of human and nonhuman minds that invited psychological and epistemological examination of minds by using the identical methods and categories for man and beast.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 83,878

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Contractualism and our duties to nonhuman animals.Matthew Talbert - 2006 - Environmental Ethics 28 (2):201-215.
Hume and the second-quality analogy.John Corvino - 2008 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 6 (2):157-173.
Do Animal Have Interests Worthy of Our Moral Interest?Peter Miller - 1983 - Environmental Ethics 5 (4):319-333.
Science, knowledge, and animal minds.Dale Jamieson - 1998 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 98 (1):79–102.
The failure of theories of personhood.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1999 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 9 (4):309-324.


Added to PP

154 (#96,418)

6 months
1 (#501,187)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tom Beauchamp
Georgetown University

Citations of this work

Smith and Hume on Animal Minds.Richard J. Fry - 2018 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 16 (3):227-243.
Hume on Animals and the Rest of Nature.Angela Coventry & Avram Hiller - 2014 - In John Hadley & Elisa Aaltola (eds.), Animal Ethics and Philosophy: Questioning the Orthodoxy. Rowman and Littlefield International.
Hume on Nonhuman Animals, Causal Reasoning, and General Thoughts.Ryo Tanaka - 2021 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 59 (2):205-229.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references