Croatian Journal of Philosophy 21 (2(62)):251-68 (2021)

Authors
Tim Beaumont
Shenzhen University
Abstract
The passage of Mill’s Utilitarianism that sets out the condition in which one pleasure has a superior quality than another stokes interpretive controversy. According to the Lexical Interpretation, Mill takes one pleasure, P1, to be of a superior quality than another, P2, if, and only if, the smallest quantity of P1 is more valuable than any finite quantity of P2. This paper argues that, while the Lexical Interpretation may be supported with supplementary evidence, the passage itself does not rule out qualitative superiority without lexical dominance, as it only requires P1 to be more valuable than any quantity of P2 that it is possible for someone to experience. Some will object that this concession to opponents of the Lexical Interpretation still renders Mill’s condition for qualitative superiority too demanding to be plausible. However, if Mill’s qualitative rankings apply to higher-order pleasures taken in modes of existence as such rather than to the pleasures of different activities chosen from within these modes, the objection loses much of its force. One upshot is that Mill may have more to contribute to debates in contemporary population axiology than is usually acknowledged.
Keywords John Stuart Mill   pleasure   qualitative hedonism   repugnant conclusion   population axiology   utilitarianism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/croatjphil202121211
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford University Press.
Collected Works of John Stuart Mill.J. S. Mill - 1963 - [University of Toronto Press].
Well-Being. Its Meaning, Measurement and Moral Importance.James Griffin - 1990 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 52 (1):171-171.
Value Superiority.Gustaf Arrhenius & Wlodek Rabinowicz - 2015 - In Iwao Hirose & Jonas Olson (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Value Theory. New York, USA: Oxford University Press USA. pp. 225-248.

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Interpreting Mill's Qualitative Hedonism.Jonathan Riley - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (212):410–418.
J. S. Mill’s Hedonism: Activism, Experientialism and Eudaimonism.Tim Beaumont - 2018 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26 (3):452-474.
Utilitarianism.John Stuart Mill - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring Philosophy: An Introductory Anthology. Oxford University Press.
John Stuart Mill and the Ends of Sport.David T. Schwartz - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 38:32-37.
Qualitatively-Hedonistic Utilitarianism.Daniel Mahlon Holbrook - 1987 - Dissertation, The University of Iowa
A Defence of Mill's Qualitative Hedonism.Rex Martin - 1972 - Philosophy 47 (180):140 - 151.
Pleasure: 'The Choice of Hercules'.Lorraine Marie Arangno - 2013 - The European Legacy 18 (2):197-208.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-10-06

Total views
98 ( #119,476 of 2,507,717 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
67 ( #12,030 of 2,507,717 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes