Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (3):251-270 (1996)
: The Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments has correctly argued that persons and institutions can sometimes be held responsible for actions taken more than a half-century ago, when practices and policies on the use of research subjects were strikingly different. In reaching its conclusions, the Committee did not altogether adhere to the language and commitments of its own ethical framework. In its Final Report, the Committee emphasizes judgments of wrongdoing, to the relative neglect of culpability; it discusses mitigating conditions that are exculpatory, but does not provide a thoroughgoing assessment of either culpability or exculpation. However, the Committee's shortcomings are mild in comparison to the deficiencies in the "Report of the UCSF Ad Hoc Fact Finding Committee on World War II Human Radiation Experiments" of the University of California at San Francisco. The latter report reaches no significant judgments of either wrongdoing or culpability. The findings that should have been reached by both committees are discussed
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
History, Ethics and the Presidential Commission on Research in Guatemala.Barry Lyons - 2014 - Public Health Ethics 7 (3):211-224.
Similar books and articles
Regulating Human Participants Protection in Medical Research and the Accreditation of Medical Research Ethics Committees in the Netherlands.Marcel J. H. Kenter - 2009 - Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (1-2):33-43.
Disagreement, Consensus, and Moral Integrity.Ruth Macklin - 1996 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (3):289-311.
The Human Radiation Experiments: Final Report of the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments.Charles Weijer - unknown
Are Research Subjects Adequately Protected? A Review and Discussion of Studies Conducted by the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments.Jeremy Sugarman & Nancy E. Kass - 1996 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (3):271-282.
Chair's Perspective on the Work of the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments.Ruth R. Faden - 1996 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (3):215-221.
Research on Prisoners – a Comparison Between the Iom Committee Recommendations (2006) and European Regulations.Bernice S. Elger & Anne Spaulding - 2010 - Bioethics 24 (1):1-13.
Report of the IOM Committee on Assessing the System for Protecting Human Research Participants.Tom L. Beauchamp - 2002 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 12 (4):389-390.
The Controversy Over Retrospective Moral Judgment.Allen E. Buchanan - 1996 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (3):245-250.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #454,901 of 2,153,331 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #399,611 of 2,153,331 )
How can I increase my downloads?