On the Ternary Relation and Conditionality
Jc Beall, Ross Brady, J. Michael Dunn, A. P. Hazen, Edwin Mares, Robert K. Meyer, Graham Priest, Greg Restall, David Ripley, John Slaney & Richard Sylvan
Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (3):595 - 612 (2012)
| Authors | |
| Abstract |
One of the most dominant approaches to semantics for relevant (and many paraconsistent) logics is the Routley-Meyer semantics involving a ternary relation on points. To some (many?), this ternary relation has seemed like a technical trick devoid of an intuitively appealing philosophical story that connects it up with conditionality in general. In this paper, we respond to this worry by providing three different philosophical accounts of the ternary relation that correspond to three conceptions of conditionality. We close by briefly discussing a general conception of conditionality that may unify the three given conceptions
|
| Keywords | Ternary relation Ternary-relation semantics Possible worlds Situations Modal logics Paraconsistent logics Relevant logics Routley–Meyer semantics Conditionals Conditionality Relative relative possibility |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| Options |
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
Our Archive
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy Papers currently archived: 37,134
External links
- dx.doi.org (no proxy)
- link.springer.com (no proxy)
- link.springer.com [2] (no proxy)
- sites.google.com
(no proxy) - sites.google.com [2] (no proxy)
- jstor.org (no proxy)
- springerlink.com (no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver..
- Configure custom resolver
References found in this work BETA
An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic: From If to Is.Graham Priest - 2008 - Cambridge University Press.
View all 30 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Why Separation Logic Works.David Pym, Jonathan M. Spring & Peter O’Hearn - forthcoming - Philosophy and Technology:1-34.
Informational Semantics as a Third Alternative?Patrick Allo & Edwin Mares - 2012 - Erkenntnis 77 (2):167-185.
The Relevant Fragment of First Order Logic.Guillermo Badia - forthcoming - Review of Symbolic Logic:1-24.
View all 10 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Relational Proof System for Relevant Logics.Ewa Orlowska - 1992 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (4):1425-1440.
“Four-Valued” Semantics for the Relevant Logic R.Edwin D. Mares - 2004 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 33 (3):327-341.
The Knowledge Relation: Binary or Ternary?Rene van Woudenberg - 2008 - Social Epistemology 22 (3):281-288.
Paul Ricoeur's Panchronic and Ternary Approach to Tradition.Fanfan Chen - 2011 - Studia Phaenomenologica 11:155-178.
A Second-Order Relevance Logic with Modality.James B. Freeman & Charles B. Daniels - 1979 - Studia Logica 38 (2):113 - 135.
Conditional Probability From an Ontological Point of View.Rani Lill Anjum, Johan Arnt Myrstad & Stephen Mumford - manuscript
A Routley-Meyer Semantics for Truth-Preserving and Well-Determined Lukasiewicz 3-Valued Logics.G. Robles & J. M. Mendez - 2014 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 22 (1):1-23.
A Counterexample to the Contrastive Account of Knowledge.Jason Rourke - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 162 (3):637-643.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2010-11-13
Total downloads
199 ( #29,091 of 2,308,436 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #65,273 of 2,308,436 )
2010-11-13
Total downloads
199 ( #29,091 of 2,308,436 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #65,273 of 2,308,436 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Monthly downloads
