Jc Beall, Ross T. Brady, J. Michael Dunn, A. P. Hazen, Edwin D. Mares, Robert K. Meyer, Graham Priest, Greg Restall, David Ripley, John Slaney & Richard Sylvan
Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (3):595 - 612 (2012)
AbstractOne of the most dominant approaches to semantics for relevant (and many paraconsistent) logics is the Routley-Meyer semantics involving a ternary relation on points. To some (many?), this ternary relation has seemed like a technical trick devoid of an intuitively appealing philosophical story that connects it up with conditionality in general. In this paper, we respond to this worry by providing three different philosophical accounts of the ternary relation that correspond to three conceptions of conditionality. We close by briefly discussing a general conception of conditionality that may unify the three given conceptions
Similar books and articles
Relational proof system for relevant logics.Ewa Orlowska - 1992 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (4):1425-1440.
“Four-Valued” Semantics for the Relevant Logic R.Edwin D. Mares - 2004 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 33 (3):327-341.
The knowledge relation: Binary or ternary?René van Woudenberg - 2008 - Social Epistemology 22 (3):281-288.
Paul Ricoeur’s Panchronic and Ternary Approach to Tradition.Fanfan Chen - 2011 - Studia Phaenomenologica 11:155-178.
A second-order relevance logic with modality.James B. Freeman & Charles B. Daniels - 1979 - Studia Logica 38 (2):113 - 135.
Conditional probability from an ontological point of view.Rani Lill Anjum, Johan Arnt Myrstad & Stephen Mumford - manuscript
A Routley-Meyer semantics for truth-preserving and well-determined Lukasiewicz 3-valued logics.G. Robles & J. M. Mendez - 2014 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 22 (1):1-23.
A counterexample to the contrastive account of knowledge.Jason Rourke - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 162 (3):637-643.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Mathematical Explanation by Law.Sam Baron - 2019 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 70 (3):683-717.
Free of Detachment: Logic, Rationality, and Gluts.Jc Beall - 2015 - Noûs 49 (2):410-423.
A Counterfactual Approach to Explanation in Mathematics.Sam Baron, Mark Colyvan & David Ripley - 2020 - Philosophia Mathematica 28 (1):1-34.
Structures and circumstances: two ways to fine-grain propositions.David Ripley - 2012 - Synthese 189 (1):97 - 118.
References found in this work
Modal Logic: Graph. Darst.Patrick Blackburn, Maarten de Rijke & Yde Venema - 2001 - Cambridge University Press.
An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic: From If to Is.Graham Priest - 2008 - Cambridge University Press.