Opposing views on animal experimentation: Do animals have rights?
Ethics and Behavior 7 (2):113 – 121 (1997)
| Abstract |
Animals have moral standing; that is, they have properties (including the ability to feel pain) that qualify them for the protections of morality. It follows from this that humans have moral obligations toward animals, and because rights are logically correlative to obligations, animals have rights.
|
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| DOI | 10.1207/s15327019eb0702_3 |
| Options |
Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
The Question of Animal Awareness: Evolutionary Continuity of Mental Experience.Donald R. Griffin - 1981 - William Kaufmann.
The Unheeded Cry: Animal Consciousness, Animal Pain, and Science.Bernard E. Rollin - 1989 - Oxford University Press.
View all 8 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
The Foundations of Attitudes About Animal Research.Donald A. Saucier & Mary E. Cain - 2006 - Ethics and Behavior 16 (2):117 – 133.
On the Need to Redress an Inadequacy in Animal Welfare Science: Toward an Internally Coherent Framework.Andrew Fenton - 2012 - Biology and Philosophy 27 (1):73-93.
Similar books and articlesAnimal Rights and the Problem of Proximity.David E. W. Fenner - 1998 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (1):51-61.
Animal Ethics: Toward an Ethics of Responsiveness.Kelly Oliver - 2010 - Research in Phenomenology 40 (2):267-280.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total downloads
197 ( #24,912 of 2,225,325 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #32,932 of 2,225,325 )
2009-01-28
Total downloads
197 ( #24,912 of 2,225,325 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #32,932 of 2,225,325 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Monthly downloads
My notes
