Opposing views on animal experimentation: Do animals have rights?
Ethics and Behavior 7 (2):113 – 121 (1997)
| Authors |
|
| Abstract |
Animals have moral standing; that is, they have properties (including the ability to feel pain) that qualify them for the protections of morality. It follows from this that humans have moral obligations toward animals, and because rights are logically correlative to obligations, animals have rights.
|
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| DOI | 10.1207/s15327019eb0702_3 |
| Options |
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
The Question of Animal Awareness: Evolutionary Continuity of Mental Experience.Donald R. Griffin - 1981 - William Kaufmann.
The Unheeded Cry: Animal Consciousness, Animal Pain, and Science.Bernard E. Rollin - 1989 - Oxford University Press.
View all 8 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
On the Need to Redress an Inadequacy in Animal Welfare Science: Toward an Internally Coherent Framework.Andrew Fenton - 2012 - Biology and Philosophy 27 (1):73-93.
The Foundations of Attitudes About Animal Research.Donald A. Saucier & Mary E. Cain - 2006 - Ethics and Behavior 16 (2):117 – 133.
Similar books and articles
Animal Rights and the Problem of Proximity.David E. W. Fenner - 1998 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (1):51-61.
Animal Ethics: Toward an Ethics of Responsiveness.Kelly Oliver - 2010 - Research in Phenomenology 40 (2):267-280.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total downloads
209 ( #26,728 of 2,308,579 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #75,314 of 2,308,579 )
2009-01-28
Total downloads
209 ( #26,728 of 2,308,579 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #75,314 of 2,308,579 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Monthly downloads
