Ethics and Behavior 7 (2):113 – 121 (1997)

Authors
Tom Beauchamp
Georgetown University
Abstract
Animals have moral standing; that is, they have properties (including the ability to feel pain) that qualify them for the protections of morality. It follows from this that humans have moral obligations toward animals, and because rights are logically correlative to obligations, animals have rights.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1207/s15327019eb0702_3
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,514
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Morals, Reason, and Animals.S. F. Sapontzis - 1987 - Temple University Press.
Morals, Reasons, and Animals.R. G. Frey - 1989 - Ethics 100 (1):191-192.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
228 ( #36,097 of 2,348,301 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #186,050 of 2,348,301 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes