Opposing views on animal experimentation: Do animals have rights?

Ethics and Behavior 7 (2):113 – 121 (1997)
Abstract
Animals have moral standing; that is, they have properties (including the ability to feel pain) that qualify them for the protections of morality. It follows from this that humans have moral obligations toward animals, and because rights are logically correlative to obligations, animals have rights.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1207/s15327019eb0702_3
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,334
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Morals, Reason, and Animals.S. F. Sapontzis - 1987 - Temple University Press.
The Great Ape Project.Peter Singer & Paola Cavalieri (eds.) - 1993 - St. Martin's Griffin.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
197 ( #24,912 of 2,225,325 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #32,932 of 2,225,325 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature